The GOOD NEWS!

THE GOOD NEWS!

Here is the recent email I sent to the law office and the response I received. Finally something positive, although we won't really see anything happen until Jason Ravsborg returns from his tour of duty (expected this December). There is nobody else that can take the time and effort to pursue opportunities to recover any funds if there are any to be found.

Personally, I have found three ways to recover my assets and build them up. Call me and I will share how. Thanks, Bruce

MY EMAIL TO WANDA HOWEY-FOX

Subject: Re: the Judge's decission about FCSL & Jeff Lowrance
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:22:26 -0700

Wanda,

Here is my regular attempt to find out if the judge is ever going to finalize our case against Jeff Lowrance and First Capital Savings & Loan?
200+ clients are anxious to find out what, if anything, is happening or will ever happen on our case.

We don't understand why it takes a year for a decision to be made. The default judgement was obtained on 9/29/2009!

Maybe you can enlighten us and give us an idea of what the legal ramifications are and what you would do if you were in our position?

Thanks for any light you can shed on this at this time. I know you would rather not deal with this, since this is Jason's group and issue to resolve.

Sincerely,

Bruce Eskander
213-285-1133 Voice, Fax, Text

Website Administrator
FCSL Investment Recovery Group

WANDA HOWEY-FOX's RESPONSE

September 28, 2010 7:19:25 AM PDT

Good morning Bruce. Progress!!!!!

I stopped into the Clerk's office when I was in Sioux Falls on September 3. I asked them if there was a "reason" that the Court had not ruled on my request for punitive damages. The Clerk looked at the file and said that she did not see a separate "motion". I had her pull up the Court's docket sheet and showed her where I had made the request. Further, I showed her the specific part of the Court's hearing minutes wherein the Court had specifically advised the punitive damages issue. In the hearing minutes it specifically states that the Court would rule on my request after she had received the affidavits. (Which happened in July, 2009).

The Clerk was horribly embarrassed because she said that when she was getting my telephone messages, she didn't see the "motion" and then just ignored them. As a result, nothing was done.

However, NOW the Court has been reminded that there is a deicsion pending; she will get it out fairly quickly. (I am quite sure that the Judge was mortified that this had slipped through the cracks).

As soon as I get it, I will forward a copy to you.

WHF