|
Arthur Rohlik
And good afternoon to you, Juliana. [hashtag thingy] commence rant
The existance of warriors conscripted or voluntary still chills me to my core. Why does anyone choose the wariors' path? Aggressor or defendant, why choose to be a warrior? I fantasize a United States government taking an unprecedented step into humility and saying saying to all anti-war protestors "You were right. Vietnam was an error. You who fled or were imprisoned, or served under protest, and who killed or who were maimed or who perished deserve not just amnesty but apology. You were right." A simple fantasy, but a fantasy all the same. I would have a bit of a national pride well up were my fantasy to come true. Yet, the incredible horror of war continues. When you invoked the dreaded concept of conscripts, it jolted me back in time to the V'Nam Era. I am a pop musician. I am in full remembrance of the occaision of being able to vote the first time. What, Doc, are you getting to? There is a pop song in the national archives exhibit regarding eighteen year old voting: EVE OF DESTRUCTION by P.F. Sloan and recorded by Barry McGuire. "violence flarin', bullets loadin', you're old enough to kill but not for votin', you don't believe in war, what's that gun you're totin'" . I would not have written so well as that, but I would have contrived a lyric to include the flip side of "killin' " which is of course diein'. Old enough to be cannon fodder, what a vile concept. Ahem. [hashtag thingy] end rant
|