|
Lester Cox
All the debate over Flock cameras and privacy has been pretty interesting.
I understand the concerns about the Fourth Amendment, although I think applying it directly to license-plate cameras may be a bit of a stretch. At the same time, these cameras have proven useful in solving crimes, locating stolen vehicles and helping find missing people. So I find myself wondering whether the trade-off in privacy is worth the benefit.
The reality is, cameras are already everywhere. I’ve read that if you live or work in Manhattan, you may be photographed hundreds of times in a single day.
But what really got me thinking about this happened today.
I called the Ford dealer in Show Low about a possible battery exchange on my Lincoln. I gave the service department my VIN, and they seemed to know just about everything about the vehicle—mileage, tire pressures, battery level, how much gas was in it and even where it was parked.
That was an eye-opener.
If that much information about a modern automobile can be accessed remotely, I have to believe a talented hacker could potentially track a lot of vehicles without ever needing a Flock camera.
I certainly don’t want to see America become a society where everyone is monitored and tracked every day. There has to be a line somewhere between public safety and personal privacy.
Then again, if somebody is tracking me every day, they’re probably getting pretty bored.
So I’m curious what everyone else thinks:
Flock cameras — good public-safety tool, unacceptable invasion of privacy, or a reasonable trade-off somewhere in between?
|