Stewart Myrent
First, I want to say that getting the Democrats back in control of the House, was job #1. I don't really want to address what's coming, but president Trump will not have an easy time of it, from here on out. I think that getting control of the Senate, was probably doomed from the beginning, particularly in this voting cycle, as the most vulnerable seats were Democratic seats. However, I believe that at least 1/3 of our government (make that 1/2 of 1/3), will operate within norms that we expect & with the probity, that we deserve. Janis - you stated, "it is sad that elections are a money maker for the media...", and, "billions spent on TV advertising would go a long way to feed hungry children, clean up the plumbing in Flint, help with opioid addiction.." With all of those things, I couldn't agree more, I would add infrastructure (badly needed) to your list, and then you finished "in honor of the first amendment why not offer free airtime to political candidates as public service announcements?" I see 2 things wrong with your suggestion. First, I'm fairly sure that the election "pros", whomever they are, will quickly find ways to "game" the system, to be first in line for their free "public service announcements", or how to get even more mileage, more ad spots, than their competitors, and it wiil quickly become just another way, for candidates to get the public to foot the bill. You understand that someone's got to pay for that airtime, right? The 2nd problem I have with your plan for free airtime, is we still have the problems with the hungry children, the plumbing in Flint, the opioid addiction & infrastructure, etc., to pay for. Unless you get any campaign who wants to avail themselves of the free airtime, to guarantee to donate, say $20 million, to feed the kids, fix the plumbing, etc., then I don't see it helping the hungry kids, or anything else. I would guess that anything that actually helped feed the kids, would be from funds that have a less mercenary motivation. Something more charitable, more empathetic. It may be too much to ask from any politician.
|