Robert Bramel

What an exciting world we live in! When we were in high school the idea of a black hole was just that—a weird idea. Whether one existed at the center of our Milky Way galaxy was hardly considered. Detecting such a thing seemed utterly impossible.

Yet--

Today, after decades of work from more than 300 scientists from 80 institutions, those scientists have just produced an image of the very center of our galaxy, and sure enough the image is exactly what Einstein’s more than 100-year-old theory predicts.

This image is a combination of the glow from the radiation around the black hole and the shadow that the black hole produces. The resolution of this image is equivalent to seeing a golf ball on the surface of the Moon.

Absolutely amazing!!

Robert Bramel

Gregg Wilson

Robert,

Gravity is NOT attractive. Black holes do not exist. There was no Big Bang. The universe is not expanding. (An idea brought forth by Albert Einstein because he never bothered reading Isaac Newton's statements.) Hubble's preciction that the universe was expanding because of a shift to red light was not valid. A light wave does not get a free ride across the universe. The gravitational flux wears down it's frequency.

The universe is stable.

One can observe a black something but it is polydeuterium - as I will demonstrate.

Patrick Musgrave

hi ken ithink the movie about heavy warter being made was called heroes os telemark staring kirk douglas. im not suer when it was made

John Wherley

The Heroes of Telemark is a 1965 British war film directed by Anthony Mann based on the true story of the Norwegian heavy water sabotage during the Second World War from Skis Against the Atom, the memoirs of Norwegian resistance soldier Knut Haukelid. The film stars Kirk Douglas as Dr. Rolf Pedersen and Richard Harris as Knut Straud, along with Ulla Jacobsson as Anna Pederson. It was filmed on location in Norway.

Bill Engelhardt

Good catch, gentlemen.

I withdraw Dam Busters in deference to Heroes of Telemark. 

Gregg Wilson

Benjamin Franklin experimented with lightning and declared electricity to be a fluid. He decribed his kite with a wire as being "positive" at the kite end because it had an excess of electrical fluid and the position at his end as being "negative" because of the lack of electrical fluid. He did not identify any particles as being "positive" or "negative". During the 1800's it became customary to use positive and negative in designing electrical circuits.

In 1897, J.J. Thompson proposed a "plum pudding" model of an atom of negative electrons buried in a "soup" of positively charged matter. It must be pointed out that charge, negative and positive, were human concepts and had no hard identification with reality.

Ernest Rutherford, with his co-workers, began to envision the atom being like a miniature solar system. He envisioned the atom as having a very tiny nucleus of positive protons surrounded by a "cloud" of negative electrons. That is, the atom was basically empty. His experiment of firing alpha particles, positively charged, at a very thin film of gold nuclei, led him to declare that the atom was empty. The problem is an alpha particle velocity is 10% of the speed of light. Any collision between the alpha particle and a gold nucleus would send both entities forward at 370 miles per second. Because there were very few ricochets, why the atom must be empty.

Not so.

By his definition that the proton nucleus was positive and electrons were negative, the electrons would instantly collapse into the nucleus. Niels Bohr said, ex cathedra, that the electrons would stay in orbit. No evidence or logic  exists to prove this. Linus Pauling proceeded to organize the electrons into seven shells each with 1 to 7 subshells. Does anyone believe this nonsense?

The foundation of chemistry is geometry. Molecules have definite geometry with fixed locations and directions for chemical bonding. A proton must agree with geometry but it also has to have a relationship with the gravitational flux and the light carrying medium.

Next time the geometry of the proton.

Gregg Wilson

THE PROTON

Mainstream science does not accept the existence of the gravitational flux or the light carrying medium. Presumably, they accept the existence of the proton. We can consider the proton to be the particle of the third medium of the Universe although this medium is scattered as galaxies, stars, planets and so on..

Since the proton cannot be directly observed, the default supposition is that it is a sphere, a predictable first guess. Let’s drop a single proton into our two mediums of graviton flux and elyson “sea”. What does it do? Nothing. It is simply in the way. The proton is an obstacle, nothing more.

The gravitons would push the elysons up against the proton where the elysons would condense. The gravitons would then push the condensed elysons downhill if there is a downhill. But with a sphere, every point is at the same elevation. The elysons cannot flow in order to get away from the gravitons. However, continued collisions with gravitons would raise the velocity of the condensed elysons. They would vaporize.

One cannot have elysons both condensing and evaporating at the same position at the same time. That is a contradiction. Yet we know that hydrogen atoms emit light. The answer to our seeming contradiction is that a proton is not a sphere. It must have a highest elevation and a lowest elevation. Without going into a long examination of how one can arrive at a particular geometry, various experimental facts dictate that a proton must be a hollow half sphere or a hollow cone or a hollow pyramid. Let’s use the hollow cone as an example geometry. This shape gets us out of the above problem of simultaneous condensation and evaporation at the same location.

Remember that the graviton flux is entirely random. So the shape of the proton determines the local graviton “wind” at all positions on the proton. With our hollow cone, the highest elevation point is the outside tip of the hollow cone. The lowest elevation is the inside tip of the hollow cone. Some elysons, which condense on the outside tip of the cone, will flow downhill to the outside base of the cone. They will then be pushed over the lip to the inside surface of the cone. They will then flow downhill to the bottom of the inside of the cone. At this position, they can retreat no further but they continue to be pounded by the gravitational flux. This action by gravitons transfers momentum to the liquid elysons. With no other option, they vaporize and go outward as electromagnetic waves. Examine the following figure:

Conventional atomic physics identifies the electron as being a repulsive barrier which does not allow further approach to the atom’s nucleus. It is claimed that electrons are singular particles which travel in orbits about the nucleus. It is also claimed that electrons can emit photons – supposedly singular particles also. In this new speculation, the electron is the continuous vaporizing of liquid elysium in the proton “well”. The vapor goes out as waves, which account for the phenomena of photons. Recall that previous section in this paper explained that photons are not particles but momentum waves in the light carrying medium – the Elysium.

The presence of this single proton – with its shape – interacts directly with elysons and indirectly with gravitons. This is thus an atom of hydrogen. The repulsive electron is the vaporizing Elysium.

In the three mediums described, there is only one kind of particle needed to make up each medium. No additional particles are needed. This is a classic example of Occam’s Razor. All of the particles in all three mediums act in a passive manner; they do not attempt to do anything. They do not need to have a consciousness, a mind. They are not alive. All interaction between particles occurs by collision. There is no “secret” pure energy. Any apparent pure energy can be found to be simply particles which have mass and velocity. All transfers or transformations of energy and force simply arise from collisions of these various particles with one another.

Given the asymmetric geometry of the proton, one can derive from simple analysis the following facts:

• Any collision between a graviton and a proton on its outer surface will impart momentum from the graviton to the proton. This would presumably give a push and therefore a velocity to the proton. But, any such path of a graviton, including a change in its direction because of collision, can be negated by a graviton following this exact path in the opposite direction. Therefore, the net effect of push on the proton is zero.

• Any collision between a graviton and a proton on its inner surface will impart momentum from the graviton to the proton. This momentum transfer will cause the proton to have a velocity in the direction of its conical tip. Another graviton, following the exact same path – but in the reverse direction – does not cancel out the momentum transfer of the first graviton. Instead, it adds the same amount of momentum transfer and increase in velocity to the proton as did the first graviton. The net result is that the proton travels in the direction of its tip (of the cone). Refer to the figure below:

• The condensing and vaporization of elysons on the proton will also add to the forward velocity. However, much more importantly, the outside tip of the proton will not have an outward, expanding, repulsive force. It will interact with another proton only through hard contact. The base of the hollow cone proton will have a constant, outward, expanding, repulsive force of vaporizing elysons. Any other proton, which is approaching the first proton on its hollow side, would be pushed away by the vaporizing elysons. The net result is that an approach of two protons, cone tip to cone tip, is favored.

• The movement of elysons on the proton surface is always downhill, until they are vaporized. This progression is not reversible. This gives the first, fundamental explanation of why time moves “forward” and not in reverse. Classical thermodynamics claims that interactions at the atomic level are completely reversible but this is not correct.

Let’s see if there is an experiment, which backs up the speculation of an asymmetrically shaped proton:

A magnet is encapsulated within a vacuum chamber. The magnet is shaped such that the two poles point to one another, but there is a significant gap between them. At the left side of the vacuum chamber, a stream of atomic hydrogen is shot through a pin hole. As the hydrogen approaches and enters the gap between the two poles of the magnet, the gas stream splits into two equal streams. One stream goes to the North Pole and the other to the South Pole. This behavior is an actual experimental result. Refer to the figure below:

It is proposed that magnetism is simply the random gravitational flux being refocused into a bidirectional stream by the atomic geometry of the magnet. It is noteworthy that the force of magnetism is constant and never ending. It does not require any apparent energy input and it does not give off heat. It has been found to be “instantaneous” just like gravity. Let’s see what would happen to a hollow cone proton entering the magnetic “field”. The figure below shows a proton, still in a random gravitational flux, approaching the magnetic field.

Having entered the magnetic field:

The slightest orientation of the proton tip to either magnetic pole will push the proton to that pole. As can be seen above, the gravitons impacting the outer surface will lose some momentum but continue to the right. Gravitons impacting the inner surface will have their direction basically reversed, thus granting more momentum to the proton. Since the orientation of atomic hydrogen protons is entirely random in the oncoming stream of hydrogen, sheer randomness will split the entire atomic hydrogen stream into two equal streams, each one heading to a magnetic pole. Please note that no attractive force is involved. It is all push.

Gregg Wilson

HYDROGEN

The simplest molecule is the hydrogen molecule. When two hydrogen atoms come near one another – tip to tip – they shield each other from the graviton “wind” just like the Earth and the Moon shield one another. This causes a relative lack of gravitons moving along the common center line between the two atoms. They are naturally “attracted” to one another and finally line up tip to tip. Refer to the figure below:

The geometry of the two atoms, touching one another, determines the local gravitational “wind”. In this situation, downhill on the outside of the hollow cone protons is now reversed and liquid Elysium flows from the base to the tip. Elysons, which have piled up against the proton and liquefied, flow towards the union of the two proton tips. This liquid forms a “glue” or chemical “bond” between the two atoms. The vaporizing elysons, coming out of the inside of the two hollow proton cones, keep pushing the two tips together. The liquid Elysium population at the chemical bond position is a dynamic population. Elysons in liquid phase are constantly flowing down the outer surface to the chemical bond position and liquid elysons are constantly evaporating at the chemical bond position. This bond, being liquid, is obviously pliable. The two hydrogen atoms can stretch, rotate and bend at this liquid point.

All chemical bonds have this character, with variations depending on the geometry of various nuclei. If two atoms have multiple chemical bonds between them, that will restrict the orientation and movement of the two atoms. For instance, that would certainly be the case for the two nitrogen atoms, which have triple bonds in the N₂ molecule. One could anticipate that, from a geometric viewpoint, the breakage of the N₂ molecule would require more disruptive energy than for the H₂ molecule.

Collision between two H₂ molecules could easily break the bonds apart and result in hydrogen atoms. Collision between two N₂ molecules would have to occur at a very high temperature (velocity) in order for N₂ triple bonds to be broken, resulting in atomic nitrogen.

Gregg Wilson

DEUTERIUM

We now come to nuclear fusion. Conventional nuclear physics claims that fusion can only occur at incredibly high temperatures (millions of degrees), i.e. extremely high velocities for the nuclei. It also claims that when the nuclei fuse, there is a vast release of energy. Neither claim stands up to common sense. Various teams at universities or other government institutions have spent countless billions of dollars over the past sixty years, to create nuclear fusion reactors. They have all been spectacular failures. Fusion has not occurred and there has been no net release of energy.

The University of Wisconsin nuclear team presents a perfect example. They predicted, according to mainstream theory, that the ideal reactants for the greatest fusion release of energy would be Helium-3 nuclei. They achieved their goal of millions of degrees temperature, confinement of the Helium-3 nuclei by powerful magnets and enough time duration to get results from the countless millions of collisions. The results were no release of energy and an outward flux of 140 million protons per second. Since Helium-3 nuclei are made of three protons – not neutrons, what they achieved was fission. The colliding nuclei broke apart into singular protons.

They ignored the actual results – as did the rest of the mainstream nuclear scientists – and proclaimed that we must make a gigantic effort to go to the Moon and “mine” all of its Helium-3 for use in nuclear fusion reactors here on Earth. When one obeys dogma and stays faithful to mainstream science, there is no limit on human insanity.

Observations of newly forming stars show them surrounded by a large belt of black, opaque nebulae. Apparently, nuclear fusion can occur at “cold” temperatures!

Let’s examine the figure below:

If overall gravitational pressure has compressed the molecular hydrogen nebula enough, the molecules will break apart to atomic hydrogen – due to collisions between the molecules. On rare, random occasions, when two hydrogen protons approach one another – base to base – they will once again shield one another from the gravitational “wind”. In this case, the liquid Elysium flows downhill from the cone tip to the base on each proton. Because the hollow, inner portions of the proton cones are being shielded from the graviton flux, the repulsive outflow of vaporizing Elysium will die down. But the liquid Elysium will still flow into the inside of the hollow cones. When the two cones mate – base to base – there will be a fair amount of liquid Elysium trapped inside the two cones. The graviton flux will then hold the two cones together.

Something else gets trapped inside the two cones when they mate. One or more gravitons. Even though the velocity of the graviton is about 20 billion times the speed of light, one or more of them will be trapped. If one argues that they are fast enough to escape, then they are equally fast enough to get in. The graviton is not alive and it does not have any motivation. Its behavior is absolutely passive.

Let’s suppose that the joining of two proton hollow cones captures one graviton for every one thousand elysons. Let’s even have the elysons be at room temperature, 70^oF. A plausible ratio would be for an elyson to have one millionth the mass of the proton, and a graviton have one millionth the mass of an elyson. Within the cavity, the trapped gravitons will collide with all the elysons until they all have a common temperature, i.e. a common speed. The fundamental principle here is conservation of momentum:

Mass of graviton * velocity of graviton + 1,000 * mass of elyson * velocity of elysons = a constant value.

The initial velocity of the one graviton is 20 billion times the speed of light. The initial velocity of the 1,000 elysons is “zero”. Carrying out the mathematics, the final, equilibrium velocity of each elyson is 5,996,000,000 meters per second. Or 3,726,000 miles per second. We can use the kinetic theory of gases to determine the temperature of these 1,000 elysons:

(velocity)^2 meters² / second² = 3 * R * T / M

Where:

R = gas constant = 8.314 kg * meter² / second² /mole / ^oK

T = absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin

M = mass of a graviton in kilograms / mole

Carrying out the computation, we get a temperature of 14.5 million ^oK. This temperature is right in the middle of observed temperature range of an atomic bomb detonation being from one million ^oK to one hundred million ^oK. So, the “incredible, mysterious” nuclear energy inside the nucleus is not incredible or mysterious at all. It comes from gravitons and elysons being trapped within the cavity formed by two protons joining together, base to base.

Because this deuterium molecule has no repulsive “electron” force, it is possible to form polydeuterium under pressure.

The deuterium atoms come together because they are pushed together by the gravitational flux. There is no attractive force; they are simply in each other’s way. The deuterium atoms would have a very thin layer of liquid Elysium on their pyramidal side surfaces, so this liquid Elysium probably acts as a “glue”. This nuclear fusion is the only nuclear fusion which happens. The theory that larger nuclei such as iron are formed through incredibly high velocities at temperatures of billions of degrees Kelvin is not needed. In fact, there is no evidence of stars having such temperatures at or near their surface.

There is no apparent reason or evidence that these collisions would release immense amount of energy.

Bill Engelhardt

On this date 60 years ago. 

Gregg Wilson

A few properties of deuterium:

When the deuterium oxide concentration is well beyond parts per million in water, it chemically combines with other entities, mostly like other deuterium oxide molecules. This blocks (interfers with) the normal intake of molecular oxygen into living tissues and the release of carbon dioxide. This is what "toxicity" is.

Deuterium does not emit light. Therefore, it is black.

In the space of a nebula, contracting to be a solar system, deuterium polymerizes. There is no stopping this polymerizing until there is no deuterium left.

A perfect example is sunspots. They are black and grow substantially larger than the Earth. Collisions between them cause nuclear fission and create massive flares out of the Sun.

You say that you see a monstrous "black hole" at the center of a galaxy?

It is simply polydeuterium.

End of sermon.

Al Peffley

Since we are addressing interesting, theoretical physics topics:  

"Muons", anyone?

I stumbled across this recent quantum physics science experiment article during one of my  private email message discussions with Gregg after browsing through his book.

Our son who is retired from the Navy Submarine Service as a former nuclear propulsion operator works for the DoE labs at Los Alamos, NM. He has worked on a linear particle accellerator team at the lab.

I have always been interested in magnetic fields and their effects on biological and electronic/power subsystems and components(EMP/EMI, etc.). I am not a physics science follower like some, but this muon particles experiment article with experiment discussions looked interesting to me...

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/muon-physics-standard-model-particles

Cheers,

Al

Al Peffley

All,

OK- for some reason I was now able to post a User Forums health information topic concerning an updated interview with Dr. Zelenko MD and Dave on the X-22 Report Channel this week.

Zelenko's protocols saved my life with a complete recovery from the COVID infection that I endured last November, 2021. the X-22 Report interview is hyperlinked in the posting content. I also attached a Zelenko pre-hospital protocol diagram to the post. please tell me if you cannot use the link to review the interview or see the diagram pdf file posted there.This is not medical advice from me to you -- i am not a medical services person. Stay awake and keep informed to seek the truth.  I am living proof that the protocols worked for me and my primary care doctor at Kaiser.

Be prepared for the upcomming economic recession wave peak. Some regions will have more food and energy price hikes and supply shortages than others.

Do your own research.  Send me a brief response if you want me to post a list of more alternative news source hyperlinks on the internet [like X-22] on the User Forums section, or here, if it's tolerated.

I am a vet, a multiple health incidents survivor, and an AMERICAN patriot. I do care about all of you. I believe God wins this global war battle against good people; please pray for the win against the evil ones trying to subjugate us with the Global Reset.

Cheers,

Al

May 21,2022

Al Peffley

Ah yes, "Beatlemania" and the follow-on McCartney 1970's band,"Wings" (with Linda & crew). Unfortunately, only two Beatles made it past age 64 - Paul & Ringo. Linda died at 58 from cancer, after being married to Paul for 29 years. Paul ended up being the care giver, not Linda. They were all veagans (Paul, Linda and Ringo)

My favoriteBeatle albums were Rubber Soul and Revolver.

After a few months at the UW in 1964, I entered HCC in 1965 for a continuation of my freshman year as a biological sciences major. The Beatles were still popular and making the big bucks before the breakup. British Beatles clothes fashion was popular in 1965. Beattle boots, English tweed coats, Nehru clong sleve shirts, skinny ties and  tailored pants, and breezy long haircuts were in style still. I liked the quality leather black boots and tailored pants, worn with a dress shirt and a lambs wool v-necked sweater (from that mens' clothing store across from Bell's on 152nd.)Young and still skinny, I liked the styleand wearing the British clothes. As Phil Lampman used to say in the day:, we could "Stand on a city corner and stick our tongue out and pass for a zipper". Phil was born in England two years before my entry on earth in Olympia after the War. LOL! I still keep in contact with Phil.

Bill Engelhardt

Virginia Wolfe (Scheffer)

Bill.......your post is so sad.  Hoping somewhere we can put a stop to all of this madness.  We can never forget all those we mourn.

Bill Engelhardt

Young people have no idea how tough we had it.

Linda Pompeo (Worden)

Those were the days! 

Who would'a ever thought we would be packing a phone around in our pocket all day long.

Larry Ohrt

This is an invite to Highline High School's ribbon cutting cermony on June 15, 2022 at 5:30pm. There will be refreshments and tours of the new building.  Please use the link at  RSVP link

Al Peffley

The shootings are similar to 9/11/01 attacks. You must arrest and deal with the active shooters before they commit their evil act. their online social media postings are usually very telling. Many of the teenage shooters come from dysfunctional (drug abuse & physically abusive) and fatherless families. There is no protection for students if the adults present have no means to protect them against an active shooter. I participated in an active shooter live exercise in the Longview School District in 2011. Many LE participants and the county agencies were not properly prepared for it (especially the Fire & Rescue people teamed with the local hospital.) They had no Warm Zone response plan. The "Warm Zone" is where medical response personnel treat victims and gather evidence of the incident with a well-documented evidence gathering procedure that ensures information is collected for future trials and hearings.The "Hot Zone" is the incident activity area. All of this is described in the Incident Command System documents created after 9/11. People with facility master lock keys for reponders to use are vital to a successful response by responding LE agencies. Poor facility design can inibit effective response from LE and Fire & Rescue trama teams (ref.: 2015 UCC active shooter classroom shooting in Roseberg, OR.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umpqua_Community_College_shooting

God bless the person who has the resources to respond in kind and who runs to the source of gun fire to negate the threat...

Are MIND CONTROL OPERATIONS (ref.: MK Ultra) employed (through the Internet and otherwise?) We will probably never know. Save the children. Our society is broken...

Virginia Wolfe (Scheffer)

Al, you are spot on....we have to fix our broken society.  Too many children are already left behind. They become empty human beings, committing unspeakable acts. Very sad.

Bill Engelhardt

June 6, 1944.

Tom Nixon

It's with a heavy heart that I am informing our classmates that my cousin Jack Fouts passed away last evening in Spokane. Jack has been battling pulmonary hypertension for several years. It's too soon to pass on any details regarding funeral services but will do so when available. Prayers for Jack please. Tom Nixon

Karen Buck (White)

So very sorry for your loss. Thanks for taking the time to share the information with us during your time of sorrow.  Please take care! Prayers are headed your cousin's way as well as to you.