header 1
header 2
header 3

Message Forum - GENERAL

Welcome to the Bethesda Chevy Chase High School Message Forum.

The message forum is an ongoing dialogue between classmates. There are no items, topics, subtopics, etc.

Forums work when people participate - so don't be bashful! Click the "Post Message" button to add your entry to the forum.


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  

10/05/24 10:06 AM #17545    

 

Jay Shackford

JD Smirks His Way into the Future

 

By Maureen Dowd

New York Times Opinion Columnist, reporting from Washington.

 

When I’ve covered the campaigns of women on presidential tickets, the question invariably arises: “Is she tough enough to be commander in chief?”

With the bubbly Geraldine Ferraro, a lot of voters had their doubts.

There was less worry with Hillary Clinton. She was a gold-plated hawk who voted to let President George W. Bush invade Iraq and persuaded President Barack Obama to join in bombing Muammar el-Qaddafi’s Libya.

It is not surprising, with cascading conflicts, that Republicans are leveling the toughness question at Kamala Harris. This week the Trump/Vance campaign released an ad called “Weakness.” (Donald Trump also ran an ad called “Weakness” against Nikki Haley, a hawk.)

The ad’s subtext is clearly gender, trying to exploit Kamala’s problems winning over Black and white working-class men.

 

In a Times/Siena College poll last month, 55 percent of respondents said Trump was respected by foreign leaders while 47 percent said that of Harris.

The ad claims Harris is not tough enough to deal with China, Russia, Iran or Hamas. It features actors playing Vladimir Putin, Hamas fighters and a tea-sipping ayatollah watching videos of the candidate who wants to be the first woman president. It ends with four clips of Kamala dancing — a lot better than Trump does — and a clip of Trump walking on a tarmac with a military officer and a Secret Service agent. The tag line is: “America doesn’t need another TikTok performer. We need the strength that will protect us.”

Even though Trump lives in a miasma of self-pity and his businesses often ended up in bankruptcy, somehow his fans mistake his swagger and sneers for machismo. What a joke. Trump is the one who caves, a foreign policy weakling and stooge of Putin.

This weekend, he is martyr-milking the one moment where he did show courage, the assassination attempt in Butler, Pa., by returning to the crime scene and treating it as hallowed ground for his quasi-religious lion imagery. After vowing at the convention to never discuss the event again — “It’s actually too painful to tell” — he wants to wallow in accolades from Elon Musk and JD Vance, and sell more of his $299 “FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT” high-tops depicting his bloody face and raised fist.

His new ad slams Harris for “anti-Israel statements” that Hamas will use as a green light “to keep murdering Israelis.”

 

But Harris has said she would always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself and she praised Israel’s killing of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, saying he was “a terrorist with American blood on his hands.”

She has, however, shown more sympathy for Palestinians than has Joe Biden. In a Trumpworld that thrives on mendacity, demonizing and dividing, sympathy is weakness.

Unless you need to fake it to improve your favorability numbers — like Vance did in his debate against Tim Walz.

David Axelrod had predicted it would be a match between a Labrador retriever and a coyote. But there were two Labs onstage.

Vance’s performance was chilling. Once I thought Trump would be an aberration for Republicans. But on Tuesday night, I saw the future of the party and it was lies piled on lies, and darkness swallowing darkness.

 

Vance seemed like a replicant. There was no sign of the smarmy right-wing troll who said Harris “can go to hell” and told CNN’s Dana Bash that he created stories about migrants eating cats and dogs to dramatize a narrative that helps the Republican ticket. (A racist narrative.)

His views against abortion are adamantine and, until recently, he was an I.V.F. opponent. He has a bizarre, degrading view of the role of women in American society.

But on Tuesday night, he put on a mask of likability and empathy. “Christ have mercy, it is awful,” Vance said, looking down and shaking his head, when Walz told of his teenage son witnessing a shooting.

The chameleon brought back the JD Vance who was the darling of Hollywood, when “Hillbilly Elegy” was made into a movie, before he ambitiously code-switched into a Trumper. His wife, Usha, a debate adviser, helped him craft a persona that made him more palatable to women.

He was wily and deceptive in how he talked about abortion, stressing that women needed “options” and sending his love to an old friend who he said had had an abortion.

 

One woman in the CNN focus group was impressed with his empathy and talk of options, saying she was surprised and encouraged that Vance sounded so “progressive.”

But before the 40-year-old JD teamed up with the 78-year-old Donald, his abortion position was draconian. For women in the wrong states, the need to get an abortion is a terrifying prospect that could lead to death, if you are denied the proper treatment. And treatment is harder to get because doctors fear going to jail.

It’s remarkable, given Vance’s compassionate tone in his book, and his plea that the people of Appalachia be understood rather than ridiculed, how easily he morphed into someone with no compassion, stereotyping migrants and women.

After nearly 90 minutes of being lulled by Vance’s sham persona, Walz finally ripped his opponent’s mask off when Vance refused to say Trump lost the last election.

“Tim,” Vance protested, “I’m focused on the future.”

It was the truest thing Vance said in a night of lying about his own positions and mythical Trump achievements.


10/05/24 06:34 PM #17546    

 

Jack Mallory

Very briefly, before turning to the apolitical:

John says, I believe to me but he's just as wrong regardless of who he's addressing it to,"you have not earned the right to an opinion."

This is a profound misunderstanding of the Constitution, specifically the 1st Amendment. I KNOW OF NO COURT, NO JUDGE, NO CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR who has ever interpreted the Constitution as requiring an American to earn the right to an opinion. Who would make the assessment of our having earned the right to an opinion? A government agency? A court? A congressional committee? Would we earn our right to free speech through correct thought? Would we need to show a record of approved political thinking in order to earn our rights?  

The Declaration of Independence says, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." Nothing about earning our rights, simply that they are ours, and inalienable

I HAVE a right to an opinion, any opinion, simply by virtue of being a human being. I don't have to EARN my rights--they're guaranteed to me by the Constitution, most particularly in the Bill of Rights. On the day that we must earn our rights, we have lost our rights. When even those sworn to protect and defend our Constitution fail to understand that they are ours by right, not by somehow earning them, we are in trouble. 

**********

And now to the apolitical! October on the water in New Hampshire.

 




10/06/24 07:00 AM #17547    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Beautiful pictures Jack.  You really are talented photographer. Love, Joanie


10/06/24 09:37 AM #17548    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Joanie, don't waste your breath and your sanity trying to make someone see what is clearly in front of them. Some people just see what they want to see and (regarding the Trump/Harris debate) hear what they want to hear. 

Maybe MAGA folks would be alarmed by Trump's increasing confusion if it were being displayed by Biden. But they see what they want to see. Confusing Nancy Pelosi and Niki Haley? Confusing Alaska with Afganistan? Confusing Hanibal Lecter with a real person? Confusing asylum seekers with asylum residents? Confusing the leaders of North Korea and Iran? He claims Kamal Harris raised taxes in California. Maybe he can explain how a District Attorney can do that? He says it's sad Florida got hit with a hurricane at the tail end of hurricane season. Hurricane season which has just begun.  He says he personally helped "save" ObamaCare. I guess he forgot the over 60 attempts to kill it. There's so much more.........  No hearsay, not third party reports,but recorded comments. The man is losing it.

If you want to read the text of his speech in Milwaukee this week. You will hear a man out of control of not only the truth, but of his own thought process. Who could want him as the leader of the free world? He makes no sense, is impossible to follow and is confused. No wonder people walk out of his rallys.  After reading what the man says word for word, I don't think Mr Smeby can call it he said she said. 

https://www.c-span.org/video/?538808-1/president-trump-campaigns-milwaukee-wisconsin

Nori seems thrilled that Gordon Sondland is backing Trump. I guess she's missed the hundreds of military leaders, former Trump administration members and other Republicans who've begged us not to vote for him. Maybe that's not what they report on Fox. I sure wish she'd respond to some of our simple requests like for example Sondlands own words "I am seeing so many attacks on democracy that eclipse Jan 6th." Can we se an instance - only one would do - of attacks on Democracy by the Biden/Harris administration? Tell us more about them if you find them. 

Mr. Smeby's snit about nobody on this forum being entitled to an opinion sounds almost as crazy as Trump. By his logic, Trump is not entitled to an opinion about brain-damaged veterans. So the only people who can talk about war wounds are those who've had them? Crazy town. I guess that includes the doctors who treated these same veterans. BTW has Trump earned the right to attack all the American citizens he has verbaly abused? If so how has he earned that right?

Nori you keep saying things like  "policy is more important than 'personality' ". How about character, decency, respect for others, selflessness? Is all we want in our leaders someone who gets the policies enacted that help ME the most? Is it all about self-interest? If that were the case, I'd vote for Trump who cut my taxes. But stupid me, I also want to see taxes cut for those less fortunate. I also have to say that I resent your saying again and again and again that these politicians are all crooks! They're all out for themselves! They're all liars! It just isn't true. Some decent politicians truly are trying to help our country. My son and daughter-in-law worked on the Hill for many years, with just such kinds of people. My son is still good friends with one of them who actually performed his wedding ceremony. Senator Chris Murphy. You'll never meet a more decent, thoughtful guy. His current focus is on the pandemic of loneliness and disassociation that he has found is crippling our country and making people feel lost and without meaning in their lives. What's in it for him to push such an idea? 


10/06/24 03:00 PM #17549    

 

Jack Mallory

Amost nap time for old guys paddling two (count 'em--TWO!) days in a row. 

Everything Joan said--YES! 

John, have you communicated your opinion, legitimately earned as a WIA veteran, to the First Felon, advising him that he himself has earned no right to an opinion? 
 

And today on my favorite, Grafton Pond:

Got there early as the mist was rising. 
 



Even when they're old and dead, trees can look pretty good. Wish we could say the same.

Mt. Cardigan. That bald summit gives nice views of the foliage!

Here, from seven years ago when my idea of fun was more vertical, is a view of Grafton Pond (upper left) from the top of Cardigan.


 


10/06/24 05:52 PM #17550    

 

Jay Shackford

(Editor’s Note:  As a follow up to Joan’s excellent post earlier today, I’m posting Peter Baker’s most recent dispatch in The New York Times that looks at Trump’s speeches over time.  Is it cognitive decline or just plain old crazy land that has been the dominant theme in his life? If you get the NYT, you can watch the actual video clips from Trump’s speeches over time.). 

 

 

Trump’s Speeches, Incrreasingly Angry and Rambling, Reignite the Question of Age

With the passage of time, the 78-year-old former president’s speeches have grown darker, harsher, longer, angrier, less focused, more profane and increasingly fixated on the past, according to a review of his public appearances over the years. 

 

By Peter Baker and Dylan Freedman/Videos by Chevaz Clarke and Aaron Byrd — Reporters for the New York Times

 

Peter Baker covered the Trump presidency and wrote a book on it with his wife, Susan Glasser. Dylan Freedman is a machine-learning engineer and a journalist working on A.I. initiatives.

Oct. 6, 2024

 

Former President Donald J. Trump vividly recounted how the audience at his climactic debate with Vice President Kamala Harris was on his side. Except that there was no audience. The debate was held in an empty hall. No one “went crazy,” as Mr. Trump put it, because no one was there.

Anyone can misremember, of course. But the debate had been just a week earlier and a fairly memorable moment. And it was hardly the only time Mr. Trump has seemed confused, forgetful, incoherent or disconnected from reality lately. In fact, it happens so often these days that it no longer even generates much attention.

He rambles, he repeats himself, he roams from thought to thought — some of them hard to understand, some of them unfinished, some of them factually fantastical. He voices outlandish claims that seem to be made up out of whole cloth. He digresses into bizarre tangents about golf, about sharks, about his own “beautiful” body. He relishes “a great day in Louisiana” after spending the day in Georgia. He expresses fear that North Korea is “trying to kill me” when he presumably means Iran. As late as last month, Mr. Trump was still speaking as if he were running against President Biden, five weeks after his withdrawal from the race.

 

With Mr. Biden out, Mr. Trump, at 78, is now the oldest major party nominee for president in history and would be the oldest president ever if he wins and finishes another term at 82. A review of Mr. Trump’s rallies, interviews, statements and social media posts finds signs of change since he first took the political stage in 2015. He has always been discursive and has often been untethered to truth, but with the passage of time his speeches have grown darker, harsher, longer, angrier, less focused, more profane and increasingly fixated on the past.

According to a computer analysis by The New York Times, Mr. Trump’s rally speeches now last an average of 82 minutes, compared with 45 minutes in 2016. Proportionately, he uses 13 percent more all-or-nothing terms like “always” and “never” than he did eight years ago, which some experts consider a sign of advancing age.

Similarly, he uses 32 percent more negative words than positive words now, compared with 21 percent in 2016, which can be another indicator of cognitive change. And he uses swearwords 69 percent more often than he did when he first ran, a trend that could reflect what experts call disinhibition. (A study by Stat, a health care news outlet, produced similar findings.)

Mr. Trump frequently reaches to the past for his frame of reference, often to the 1980s and 1990s, when he was in his tabloid-fueled heyday. He cites fictional characters from that era like Hannibal Lecter from “Silence of the Lip” (he meant “Silence of the Lambs”), asks “where’s Johnny Carson, bring back Johnny” (who died in 2005) and ruminates on how attractive Cary Grant was (“the most handsome man”). He asks supporters whether they remember the landing in New York of Charles Lindbergh, who actually landed in Paris and long before Mr. Trump was born.

He seems confused about modern technology, suggesting that “most people don’t have any idea what the hell a phone app is” in a country where 96 percent of people own a smartphone. If sometimes he seems stuck in the 1990s, there are moments when he pines for the 1890s, holding out that decade as the halcyon period of American history and William McKinley as his model president because of his support for tariffs.

 

And he heads off into rhetorical cul-de-sacs. “So we built a thing called the Panama Canal,” he told the conservative host Tucker Carlson last year. “We lost 35,000 people to the mosquito, you know, malaria. We lost 35,000 people building — we lost 35,000 people because of the mosquito. Vicious. They had to build under nets. It was one of the true great wonders of the world. As he said, ‘One of the nine wonders of the world.’ No, no, it was one of the seven. It just happened a little while ago. You know, he says, ‘Nine wonders of the world.’ You could make nine wonders. He would’ve been better off if he stuck with the nine and just said, ‘Yeah, I think it’s nine.’”

 

While elements of this are familiar, some who have known him for years say they notice a change. “He’s not competing at the level he was competing at eight years ago, no question about it,” said Anthony Scaramucci, a former Trump ally who has endorsed Ms. Harris. “He’s lost a step. He’s lost an ability to put powerful sentences together.”

“You can like Trump or hate Trump, but he’s been a very effective communicator,” Mr. Scaramucci continued. But now, he added, “the word salad buffet on the Trump campaign is being offered at a discount. You can eat all you can eat, but it’s at a discount.”

Sarah Matthews, who was Mr. Trump’s deputy press secretary until breaking with him over the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, said the former president had lost his fastball.

“I don’t think anyone would ever say that Trump is the most polished speaker, but his more recent speeches do seem to be more incoherent, and he’s rambling even more so and he’s had some pretty noticeable moments of confusion,” she said. “When he was running against Biden, maybe it didn’t stand out as much.”

Mr. Trump dismisses any concerns and insists that he has passed cognitive tests. “I go for two hours without teleprompters, and if I say one word slightly out, they say, ‘He’s cognitively impaired,’” he complained at a recent rally. He calls his meandering style “the weave” and asserts that it is an intentional and “brilliant” communication strategy.

Steven Cheung, the campaign communications director, called Mr. Trump “the strongest and most capable candidate” and dismissed suggestions that he has diminished with age. “President Trump has more energy and more stamina than anyone in politics, and is the smartest leader this country has ever seen,” he said in a statement.

The former president has not been hobbled politically by his age as much as Mr. Biden was, in part because the incumbent comes across as physically frail while Mr. Trump still exudes energy. But his campaign has refused to release medical records, instead simply pointing to a one-page letter released in July by his former White House doctor reporting that Mr. Trump was “doing well” after being grazed by a bullet in an assassination attempt.

How much his rambling discourse — what some experts call tangentiality — can be attributed to age is the subject of some debate. Mr. Trump has always had a distinctive speaking style that entertained and captivated supporters even as critics called him detached from reality. Indeed, questions have been raised about Mr. Trump’s mental fitness for years.

John F. Kelly, his second White House chief of staff, was so convinced that Mr. Trump was psychologically unbalanced that he bought a book called “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump,” written by 27 mental health professionals, to try to understand his boss better. As it was, Mr. Kelly came to refer to Mr. Trump’s White House as “Crazytown.”

Some of Mr. Trump’s cabinet secretaries had a running debate over whether the president was “crazy-crazy,” as one of them put it in an interview after leaving office, or merely someone who promoted “crazy ideas.” There were multiple conversations about whether the 25th Amendment disability clause should be invoked to remove him from office, although the idea never went far. His own estranged niece, Mary L. Trump, a clinical psychologist, wrote a book identifying disorders she believed he has. Mr. Trump bristled at such talk, insisting that he was “a very stable genius.”

“There were often discussions about whether he could comprehend or understand the policy and knowing that he didn’t really have a grasp on those kinds of things,” Ms. Matthews said of her time in the White House. “No one wanted to outright say it in that environment — is he mentally fit? — but I definitely had my moments where I personally questioned it.”

A 2022 study by a pair of University of Montana scholars found that Mr. Trump’s speech complexity was significantly lower than that of the average president over American history. (So was Mr. Biden’s.) The Times analysis found that Mr. Trump speaks at a fourth-grade level, lower than rivals like Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, who speaks at an eighth-grade level, which is roughly average for modern presidents.

Mr. Trump’s complexity level has remained relatively steady and has not diminished in recent years, according to the analysis. But concerns about his age have heightened now that he is trying to return to office, concerns that were not alleviated by his unfounded debate claim about immigrants “eating the pets” in a small town.

Polls show that a majority of Americans believe he is too old to be president, and his critics have been trying to focus attention on that. A group of mental health, national security and political experts held a conference at the National Press Club in Washington last month on Mr. Trump’s fitness. The Lincoln Project, an anti-Trump group of former Republicans, regularly taunts him with ads like one calling his debate with Ms. Harris “a cognitive test” that he failed.

Mr. Trump has appeared tired at times and has maintained a far less active campaign schedule this time around, holding only 61 rallies so far in 2024, compared with 283 through all of 2016, according to the Times analysis, although he has picked up the pace lately. He appeared to nod off during his hush-money trial in New York before being convicted of 34 felonies.

Experts said it was hard to judge whether the changes in Mr. Trump’s speaking style could indicate typical effects of age or some more significant condition. “That can change with normal aging,” said Dr. Bradford Dickerson, a neurologist at Harvard Medical School. “But if you see a change relative to a person’s base line in that type of speaking ability over the course of just a few years, I think it raises some real red flags.”

One person who has detected a change is Ramin Setoodeh, author of a new book on Mr. Trump’s days hosting “The Apprentice.” Mr. Setoodeh, who has written about Hollywood for years and first met Mr. Trump during his television days, was surprised at how much the former president had changed when he arrived at Mar-a-Lago for the first of six interviews for the book, “Apprentice in Wonderland.”

“The Donald Trump I interviewed in the early seasons of ‘The Apprentice’ had a stronger sense of time and space, and his narratives were a lot clearer,” Mr. Setoodeh said. “And the Donald Trump I interviewed for my book, ironically, could remember things that happened in the ‘Apprentice’ years well, but he struggled with more recent events.”

 

For instance, Mr. Trump could not remember the day in 2015 that NBC called to cut ties with him after he made derogatory remarks about Mexican immigrants. “He was very clear in terms of his memory of the shows,” Mr. Setoodeh said, even though his versions were often exaggerated or fabricated. “But when we went to more recent years, things got foggier.”

So foggy, in fact, that he forgot Mr. Setoodeh himself. After interviewing Mr. Trump in May 2021, Mr. Setoodeh returned in August. “When I said, ‘Do you remember sitting down with me?’ he said, ‘No, that was a long time ago,’” Mr. Setoodeh said. “It was like we started from square one. He started telling me the exact same stories. He didn’t remember what we had talked about. He didn’t remember me.”

Others who have encountered him since he left the White House have likewise described moments of forgetfulness. Most notable, perhaps, was his deposition in the defamation lawsuit brought by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who accused Mr. Trump of raping her in the 1990s. Shown a picture of Ms. Carroll, Mr. Trump confused her with his second wife, Marla Maples. (A jury later found that Mr. Trump sexually abused and defamed Ms. Carroll.)

Roberta Kaplan, who was Ms. Carroll’s lawyer, said Mr. Trump lost control at times during the proceedings, blowing up when he should have remained calm. “I assume that was always part of his personality,” she said in an interview. “But it may be getting worse.”

Others who have spent time with Mr. Trump in private, however, insist that they notice no difference.

“I never felt that cognitive ability or age was an issue,” said James Trusty, an attorney who represented Mr. Trump in his classified-documents criminal case until resigning last year after reported friction with another lawyer close to Mr. Trump.

“Like any high-powered executive, there were going to be times when he didn’t like hearing what I had to say or when we had spirited disagreements over strategy,” Mr. Trusty added. “But it was never something where I felt there was an intellectual disconnect.”

Sam Nunberg, a former Trump political adviser, said he still talked with people who see him almost daily, and had not heard of any concerns expressed about the former president’s age. “I don’t really see any major difference,” he said. “I just don’t see it.”

“He’s not linear,” he added. But “he was never linear.” At the debate with Ms. Harris, Mr. Nunberg said, Mr. Trump “seemed like he was tired” and “had an off night.” And, he added, “of course he doesn’t prepare.” But “that’s not like a Biden off night.”

Either way, watching recordings of Mr. Trump over the years yields a pretty clear evolution. The young media-obsessed developer and reality television star who spoke with a degree of sophistication and nuance eventually gave way to the bombastic presidential candidate with the shrunken vocabulary in 2016 and eventually to the aged former president seeking a comeback in 2024.

Consider the following: In 2002, Mr. Trump was interviewed for an Errol Morris documentary about “Citizen Kane,” the iconic Orson Welles film about a media tycoon. Mr. Trump gave a thoughtful analysis of the movie with a degree of introspection that would be hard to imagine today. “In real life, I believe that wealth does in fact isolate you from other people,” he said. “It’s a protective mechanism. You have your guard up much more so than you would if you didn’t have wealth.”

 

In 2011, as he was contemplating a run for the presidency, Mr. Trump addressed the Conservative Political Action Conference and sounded more partisan notes. While many of the themes would be familiar to today’s voters, he stuck closer to his script and finished his thoughts more often. His speeches in 2015 and 2016 were more aggressive, but still clearer and more comprehensible than now, and balanced with flashes of humor.

Now his rallies are powered as much by anger as anything else. His distortions and false claims have reached new levels. His adversaries are “lunatics” and “deranged” and “communists” and “fascists.” Never particularly restrained, he now lobs four-letter words and other profanities far more freely. The other day, he suggested unleashing the police to inflict “one really violent day” on criminals to deter crime.

He does not stick to a single train of thought for long. During one 10-minute stretch in Mosinee, Wis., last month, for instance, he ping-ponged from topic to topic: Ms. Harris’s record; the virtues of the merit system; Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s endorsement; supposed corruption at the F.D.A., the C.D.C. and the W.H.O.; the Covid-19 pandemic; immigration; back to the W.H.O.; China; Mr. Biden’s age; Ms. Harris again; Mr. Biden again; chronic health problems and childhood diseases; back to Mr. Kennedy; the “Biden crime family”; the president’s State of the Union address; Franklin D. Roosevelt; the 25th Amendment; the “parasitic political class”; Election Day; back to immigration; Senator Tammy Baldwin; back to immigration; energy production; back to immigration; and Ms. Baldwin again.

 

Some of what he says is inexplicable except to those who listen to him regularly and understand the shorthand. And he throws out assertions without any apparent regard for whether they are true or not. Lately, he has claimed that crowds Ms. Harris has drawn were not real but the creation of artificial intelligence, never mind the reporters and cameras on hand to record them.

He mispronounces names and places with some regularity — “Charlottestown” instead of “Charlottesville,” “Minnianapolis” instead of “Minneapolis,” the website “Snoops” instead of “Snopes,” “Leon” Musk instead of “Elon.”

In Rome, Ga., he went on an extended riff about Mr. Biden in swim trunks on a beach. “Look, at 81 — do you remember Cary Grant? How good was Cary Grant, right? I don’t think Cary Grant, he was good. I don’t know what happened to movie stars today. We used to have Cary Grant and Clark Gable and all these people. Today we have — I won’t say names because I don’t need enemies. I don’t need enemies. I got enough enemies. But Cary Grant was like, Michael Jackson once told me, ‘The most handsome man, Trump, in the world.’ Who? ‘Cary Grant.’ Well, we don’t have that anymore. But Cary Grant at 81 or 82 — going on 100, this guy, he’s 81 going on 100 — Cary Grant wouldn’t look too good in a bathing suit either, and he was pretty good-looking, right?”

 

Talking on another occasion about how tough illegal immigrants are, he drifted off into a soliloquy about whether actors could portray them in a movie: “They can’t play the role. They’ll bring in a big actor and you look and you say, ‘Look, he’s got no muscle content. He’s got no muscle! We need a little muscle!’ Then they bring in another one. ‘But he’s got a weak face! He looks weak!’” Still, he has rather high regard for his own physique. “I could have been sunbathing on the beach,” he said at another point. “You have never seen a body so beautiful. Much better than Sleepy Joe.”

He considers himself the master of nearly every subject. He said Venezuelan gangs were armed “with MK-47s,” evidently meaning AK-47s, and then added, “I know that gun very well” because “I’ve become an expert on guns.” He claims to have been named “man of the year” in Michigan, although no such prize exists.

He is easily distracted. He halted in the middle of another extended monologue when he noticed a buzzing insect. “Oh, there’s a fly,” he said. “Oh. I wonder where the fly came from. See? Two years ago, I wouldn’t have had a fly up here. You’re changing rapidly. But we can’t take it any longer.”

But like some people approaching the end of their eighth decade, he is not open to correction. “Trump is never wrong,” he said recently in Wisconsin. “I am never, ever wrong.”


10/06/24 11:05 PM #17551    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Joan, thanks for your comments.  You are right. People see what they want to see. I had a discussion with a trump supporter pointing out that Trump keeps up his racist comments against Haitian immigrants that are dangetous towards that group and that he is a racist.  So this person said if Norwegians were coming into the country I suspect he would say the same thing.  Meaning he is not racist against minority groups.  I pointed out that no matter which group it isvTrumps comments are still racist.  This person defended. There are fine people on both sides saying some marched against taking the confederate statues down.  I don't think that reason is so good but the group were loudly chanting Jews will not replace us so I said the others he referred to Were part of a racist group.  He tries to find away around what Trump says.  All alarming. Love joanie 


10/07/24 05:48 AM #17552    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Thanks Jay. That article said exactly what I was trying to.

Sorry, I just had to add a couple more quotes from the possible future leader of the free world. These are from his rally in Milwaukee this week.

Trump elaborated on his proposal to eliminate the Department of Education by describing what he envisioned the agency would look like: “I think you will have like one person plus a secretary. You’ll have a secretary. The secretary will have one person plus a secretary. And all the person has to do is: Are you teaching English? Are you teaching arithmetic? What are you doing? Reading, writing, and arithmetic. And are you not teaching woke? Not teaching woke is a very big factor. But we’ll have a very small staff.”

He spoke about immigrants from the Congo in Africa: “They come from, from the Congo in Africa. Many people from the Congo. I don’t know what that is.”

According to Trump, supporters of the Green New Deal:  "They wanted to rip down all the buildings in Manhattan and they wanted to rebuild them without windows. Take a look, you got to see the bathrooms. Basically water-free bathrooms, no water.


10/07/24 06:30 AM #17553    

 

Jack Mallory

Joan, your Trump supporter forgot this quote:

 "These are people coming in from prisons and jails. They’re coming in from just unbelievable places and countries, countries that are a disaster . . . And when I said, you know, Why can’t we allow people to come in from nice countries, I’m trying to be nice,” Mr. Trump said at the dinner, to chuckles from the crowd. “Nice countries, you know like Denmark, Switzerland? Do we have any people coming in from Denmark? How about Switzerland? How about Norway?”

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/07/us/politics/trump-immigrants-nice-countries.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb

My ability to remember minutiae like this reassure me that my brain isn't completely gone. Yet.


10/07/24 11:10 AM #17554    

 

Jay Shackford

"Trump with a Brain"

Bret Stephens/the New York Times/ in a coversation with Gail Collins

 "Vance might be the most convincing reason to vote for Harris.  He's Trump with a brain, which is what makes him genuinely scary.  Even if Trump doesn't win next month, Vance's success in debate sets him up as the leading GOP contender in 2028."  Bret Stephens

 


10/07/24 11:52 AM #17555    

 

Jack Mallory

". . . teaching woke." Yes, I can take my last breath thankful that I spent much of my life teaching woke. I've done some regrettable things in life, personally and socio-politically. I suspect many us could say that. 

But I spent decades studying and teaching history and various kinds of social science. Studying and teaching what and why human beings did and continue to do what they do, and the outcomes. Studying and teaching human beings how humans in other times, places, and cultures have lived. 

Understanding other humans, appreciating why they live as they do, make the decisions they make, creates EMPATHY: a three syllable word that means the same as the one syllable word that scares the pants off the right--WOKE. Understanding people in their own context, their own frame of reference. What is/was their material and social reality, what challenges do they face, what constrains or guides the choice that they make? What is/was their place in society, in history?

A novel can do the same, as can a poem, or a painting, or a song. I'm not a writer, or an artist. But I can die satisfied that I taught some woke. I like to think that if I'd taught Trump it might have changed his outlook, but that's a stretch. 


10/07/24 05:36 PM #17556    

 

Nora Skinker (Morton)

Actually, Joan, I was quoting Sondland with what HE conveyed in that MSNBC interview.  On the other hand, I guess I do keep saying 'policy over personality', because when it comes to empowering our enemies, turning a blind eye to millions of illegal border crossings, drug deaths (including fentanyl coming to us from China), late-term abortions, gang crime, I just don't give a rat's patoot about Trump's inflated crowd sizes, his mispronunciation of anything, mean tweets, small hands or thoughtless quotes to win attention.  Nor do I care about what he may or may not have said to Zelensky over the phone or his failure to try to protect Mike Pense on Jan. 6th (knowing full well Pense was under Secret Service protection), or whether Melania and he are happily married or whether he insisted on retaining certain government documents or...or ....or.  I'd like to say his trouble with women does not exist but apparently it is a part of his past, much like Clinton's troubles. Funny how nobody has brought up Kamala's living with the married Willy Brown or Imhoff's shocking and open physical abuse of his then girlfriend.  Heaven forbid anything personally revealing is ever thrown her way.  We don't dare: after all, she's a woman! Her interviews this week will be with Trump haters like Howard Stern, Stephen Colbert and last week it was Oprah Winfrey.  Think they won't (and didn't) softball the interview?  If she wants to be treated like men are (& Trump is), she should be brave and sit down with someone who can ask her some real questions.  Sorry to confuse you into thinking i am "thrilled" about any of this, but I did find it intriguing that a man of Sondland's distinction had chosen Trump as 'the lesser of two evils', which (unfortunately for me) takes the 'thrill' out of voting. Lesser of two evils sounds familiar, doesn't it? Seems to me, as down on Trump as he once was, Sondland has come to recognize how harmful the Biden/Harris administration as been to our country and has no recourse but to vote their policies out. If compliant diplomacy (false red-line threats?) is what you're looking for, I can certainly understand choosing Harris, but I'll opt for hardline, steadfast, tough and strong leadership.  Fear of the unknown never hurts to see in our enemies either, and our enemies seem far from fearful after the last four years. 

Oh, well, it (the choice) is what it is. Are YOU thrilled with it? 


10/07/24 08:04 PM #17557    

 

Jack Mallory

Careful, Nori-- you're awfully opinionated for someone who's never "laid on the battlefield bleeding to near death!"

But, since you've returned to Sondland--STILL no idea what his alleged Harris/Biden "attacks on democracy" are? Or what the evidence is? Kinda like high school rumor-mongering, 60 years later; doesn't matter if it's true, just keep repeating and maybe someone will believe it?

As far as I can tell, Sondland himself has neither repeated the accusation nor provided any evidence, so you're just repeating political bullshit in service of a political bullshit artist. Do you work for free?


10/08/24 02:26 PM #17558    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Oh sorry Nori. I was quoting Sondland but it was you who followed with "For those who understand putting policy first, I said and will continue to say, "amen, bro".  So cute how you use "bro". Almost like you weren't 77 years old. Okay maybe you're not thrilled. but you give him a hearty "amen." 

 Re fentanyl: While it may be produced in China and elsewhere, 99% of fentanyl brought into the US is brought in by US citizens. So who do we prosecute?

https://www.cato.org/blog/fentanyl-smuggled-us-citizens-us-citizens-not-asylum-seekers

You seem to be trying to compare Kamala's having an affair as a single woman, with Trump's abuse and sexual assault of EJean Carroll and groping and having affairs with women ( a porn star) while he was married with a new baby. I guess I don't see those as equivalent. As a woman/wife are you not offended by that? 

I guess you've missed all the interviews Kamala has done this week with 60 minutes and others. Trump backed out. I wonder why? I guess you're busy. I understand. I am too. 

Late-term abortions. Here's another one the MAGA folks keep bringing up. 1.0% of abortions take place at or after 21 weeks after the first day of the pregnant person's last menstrual period. And the majority of those are to save the life of the mother....not because the woman changed her mind. 

You seem to minimize the threat (your golden boy) VP Pense was under on Jan 6. You say he was under Secret Service care therefore implying he was totally safe. How would you then explain the calls those same Secret Service agents were making to their families when they feared for their lives?  

For the third or is it the 10th time, please give us an instance - only one would do - of attacks on Democracy by the Biden/Harris administration.

BTW I AM thrilled with Kamala!


10/08/24 03:03 PM #17559    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

NORI, it's TRUMP who did not go along with the strictest border bill that the ultra conservative James Langhorne worked on with Chris Murphy.  It was TRUMP Nori who said he didn't want to help Biden win. You are outraged by things that are not true. You don't care about most things Trump does. You are generalizing about the very rare late term abortive to save the mothers life. It's Trump who cares nothing for immigrants saying THEY poison the blood of America and are vermin.  Haitians have legal status  though people without legal status shouldn't be treated with such hatred. Trump is a racist.  Love joanie


10/09/24 06:56 AM #17560    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Hey Joanie, who cares if he's a racist, rapist, felon? As long as I like his policies!

 

Hey, here's a headline. Maybe Nori and Mr Smeby can answer? 

It’s not absurd to keep asking GOP leaders who won the 2020 election

 


10/09/24 07:04 AM #17561    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Yes, Joan, it does seem like none of these matters but the so called policies...Its really shocking how Trump can get away with anything with his most ardent base. He even admitted that he could kill someone on 5th Avenue and grab women, etc. and the base is all in. Love, Joanie


10/09/24 11:21 AM #17562    

 

Jack Mallory

Making America Great Again by providing business to Chinese publishers! We're going to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. by buying from the Chinese? Somebody explain that to me. Or should Trump's slogan be Making My Profit Margin Greater Again? 

 

 

 


10/09/24 04:34 PM #17563    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

If true, (I couldn't verify it)  Jack, why does this not surprise me?


10/09/24 04:57 PM #17564    

 

Jack Mallory

Come on, Joan, you know I wouldn't pull a Nori and repeat some bullshit without confirming it! Google "Trump bibles made in China," or any variant on that you prefer. It was something so like what I suspected that I made extra effort to confirm it, as one always should with things that confirm their prejudices!

Etc, etc, etc . . . 


10/10/24 02:07 PM #17565    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Jack, I don't distrust your thoroughness, but I did do a search and sadly it wasn't as responsive as yours. yes


10/10/24 02:26 PM #17566    

 

Jack Mallory

Google search and I have a special relationship, Joan. 

*********

Never, ever, ever let your dog up on your bed. 
 


 


10/10/24 04:13 PM #17567    

 

Glen Hirose

Jack,

Once a dog knows that they're Cute, like humans, they can become extra sassy.

      mastiff tibetan mastiff attack | Awesome | Pinterest | Tibetan mastiff ...

     Even as full grown adults, somehow the puppy still shines through.


10/10/24 08:20 PM #17568    

 

Jack Mallory

Those 30,000 years or so of canine domestication did encourage the survival and reproduction of the not-too-sassy pups, while the overly sassy ones ended up in the cooking pot! I remind my dogs of that if they get out of line, tell them PETA isn't always watching, put a nice Cabernet out around dinner time. 


10/11/24 08:10 AM #17569    

 

Jay Shackford

Do You Think Donald Trump Ever Changed a Diaper?

Take a momemt to watch Barack Obama's speech last night in Pittsburgh. It was a classic -- insightful, funny, powerful and delivered with the magic of a gifted and once-in-a-lifetime American statesman.  Gotta love Obama!


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  

agape