header 1
header 2
header 3

Message Forum - GENERAL

Welcome to the Bethesda Chevy Chase High School Message Forum.

The message forum is an ongoing dialogue between classmates. There are no items, topics, subtopics, etc.

Forums work when people participate - so don't be bashful! Click the "Post Message" button to add your entry to the forum.


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  

12/20/25 01:31 PM #18728    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Hi friends, Now Trump who took over as Director of the Kennedy Center, stuck his name on the beloved Kennedy Center that honored and memorialized John F Kennedy. Kennedy loved and promoted the arts.  How horrible that Trump who blasts free speech and artists who don't say everything he likes, put his name on the Kennedy Center. He fired all the board of directors of the Kennedy Center, and replaced them with Trump sycophants.  Of course they voted to put Trumps name on the Kennedy Center. The Kennedy family are so upset that there wasn't even the decency to leave in place the Kennedy Center name for JFK. Trump is all about himself and furthering his own wealth. He is the most corrupt President of our lifetime.  Love, Joanie


12/20/25 03:47 PM #18729    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Let's pretend it's a year ago - December 2024. If I told you I could predict the future and this is what you will see the felon do in the next year, what would you have said?????

My memory isn't good enough to have gathered all these predictions myself so I credit some of the fine folks at The Bulwark. In my case Steve Bannon's advice to "Flood the zone with shit" has worked very well on me, since I can't hold all this shit in my head at the same time. 

As always, just the facts!

**************************

He will hang giant glowering portraits of himself from Federal buildings.

He is going to, without asking anyone, destroy a wing of the White House.

He is going to build a palace-like ballroom which will dwarf the rest of the White House in size and gilt, and will be funded by private businesses who are trying to curry favors from him.

He is going to deploy masked agents into the streets of America to snatch people into unmarked cars.

He’s going to deploy the military into American cities.

He’s going to put his name on the Institute of Peace, which was established by Congress.

He is going to have the Treasury and the Mint create a coin with his face on it in defiance of precedent to not have living people on coins.

He’s going to name himself Chairman of the Kennedy Center. 

He’s going to rename the Kennedy Center after himself.

He is going to wrongly deport people who are allowed to be here, to torture prisons and gulags in other countries in defiance of court orders to turn the planes around.

He is going to sue several media companies in the billions of dollars for printing things he didn’t like (such as the Epstein letter which was released by the Epstein estate).

He is going to challenge the Constitution’s right to Birthright Citizenship. 

He’s going to pardon the guilty January 6th rioters who beat and killed law enforcement officers, some of whom went on to commit other crimes.

He’s going to pardon a convicted drug lord who imported 8 tons of drugs into our country.

He’s going to try (via tweet) to get someone pardoned (Tina Peters) who was convicted of a state crime over which he has no authority to pardon.

He is going to ask the Attorney General, Pam Bondi via direct message to bring charges against his perceived enemies (Comey and James) which will be thrown out of court.

I will add a few of my own observances..

He will claim he hardly knew his known best friend, Jeffrey Epstein, the most reknowned sex trafficer of our time.

He will be lionized by his followers to be the solution to ending sex trafficing in spite of his closeness to Epstein. 

He will promise lower prices on DAY ONE and will then institute tarrifs which cause prices to soar.

He will accumulate billions of dollars in his first year from unknown sources and will not have any oversite. 

He will accept a $400 million dollar gift airplane from Qatar with no questions asked about this illegality of presidents accepting gifts from foreign nations, nor about the felon's business dealings with Qatar.  

He will become the largest stakeholder in a nuclear fusion company (TAE Technologies) posing appaling conflict of intrest concerns.

Okay I give up. I'm running out of steam. 

Another interesting quote by the folks at Lincoln Square.

“What we’re watching with Donald Trump isn’t one scandal, or one bad day, or one dumb executive order. It’s the grinding, daily normalisation of instability, mental illness, medical coverup, personal sadism, and the Republican Party’s deliberate decision to treat that instability like it’s a brief, Spring political sun shower they can ride out.”

 


12/20/25 06:46 PM #18730    

 

Jack Mallory

Apropos of both Joanie and Joan's posts:

55 years ago, with Nixon as president, I came into political maturity in Vietnam. I was deeply ashamed of my country and its actions. Now, nearing 80, with Trump as president, I find myself deeply ashamed again. This article both explains my shame, and increases it. Explosives to enter the home of a US citizen and her young children? She could be one of my former students. 

https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000010596053/la-raid-immigration-us-citizens-video-investigation.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share,


12/21/25 12:13 PM #18731    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Jack, thanks for posting this astonishing piece of video. I watched the whole thing. An amazing job by the NYT to put together this story from the hundreds of pieces of video provided by bystanders. No hearsay, just video of exactly what happened. As I try to post, just the facts.

I fear that our country has turned into a Police State, similar to some of the countries from which these immigrants fled. God help us!


12/22/25 08:33 AM #18732    

 

Jack Mallory


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/21/world/americas/canada-gun-violence-us.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share

Is the bomb the shit out of the fuckers crowd in Canada (I like to think it doesn't exist) calling for blowing up northbound cars, trucks, kayaks, hikers, in the U.S. that might be suspected of trafficking firearms? Would our own BSOOF, nationally and here on the Forum approve? Why or why not?

 


12/22/25 11:08 AM #18733    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Thanks for your posts Jack and Joan.  Our country really is in danger with ICE waging war on folks, including citizens and the Authoritarian takeover of Trump guided by Project 2025 and his main goal of self enrichment and self promotion on buildings.  Meanwhile, people are set to starve and lose health care.  Now that his approval ratings are about 31% and there appear to be cracks in his coalition,I hope this is a good sign. Democracy is on thin ice right now.  Love, Joanie


12/23/25 08:22 AM #18734    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Hi dear friends,

Its getting very close to the Holidays so I wanted to wish all of you a very Happy Holiday and New Year. I really appreciate all of you and that we reconnected. Stay healthy and lets keep the conversation going. Love, Joanie


12/24/25 07:36 AM #18735    

 

Jack Mallory

HCR on Santa in the Cold War. Happy Holidays, y'all!

"On December 24, 2025, the North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, will celebrate seventy years of tracking Santa’s sleigh.

"According to legend, the tradition of tracking Santa’s sleigh began in November 1955, when a child trying to reach Santa on a telephone hotline advertised by a Sears, Roebuck & Co. store in Colorado transposed two digits. It was not Santa who picked up the phone, but Colonel Harry Shoup of Continental Air Defense Command, known as CONAD, located in Colorado Springs.

"Shoup was brusque when a small voice asked if he was Santa, but he later recognized that interest in Santa could be an opportunity to call public attention to the air defense system that would shield the U.S. if Soviet bombers were able to reach the country from over the North Pole. 

"After World War II, many Americans were hoping to turn away from world affairs, but U.S. and Canadian leaders worried that North America was vulnerable to an attack from the USSR over the polar region. That wasn’t on many Americans’ radar screens.

"A few weeks after the young child’s call, Shoup told his public-relations officer to inform the news wire services that CONAD was tracking Santa’s sleigh as it traveled from his home at the North Pole. Reporters loved the story, and the following year they called to see if the trackers would be operational again.

"In 1957,* Canada and the U.S. formed the North American Air Defense Command, or NORAD. By charting Santa’s ride, the agency illustrated the military’s mission to protect the citizens of the continent by tracking an object traveling from the North Pole, over the Arctic Ocean, to Canada, and beyond.

"By Christmas Eve 1960, NORAD was posting updates and tracking the flight of “S. Claus.” It reported that the sleigh had made an emergency landing on the ice of Hudson Bay. When Canadian fighter jets stopped by to check on the incident, they found Santa tending to a reindeer’s injured foot. Once the animal was bandaged, the jets escorted Santa’s sleigh as he completed his annual flight. Since then, fighter jets have frequently intercepted the sleigh to salute Santa, who reins in his team to let the slower jets catch up.

"Over time, NORAD became the North American Aerospace Defense Command, and its mission expanded to include collecting information about the Earth’s atmosphere, coastal waters, and intelligence. It is still key to U.S. and Canadian defense.

"And what began in 1955 as a way to familiarize war-weary Americans with Cold War–era defense systems has become an operation in which more than 1,000 Canadian and American military personnel, Defense Department civilian workers, and local participants near Colorado Springs, where NORAD is headquartered, volunteer to answer the more than 100,000 phone calls that come from children around the world on Christmas Eve. It is a testament to the longstanding U.S.-Canadian friendship.

"For one night a year, the hard-edged world of international alliances, intelligence, radar, satellites, and fighter jets turns into a night for adults to create a magical world for children."

https://open.substack.com/pub/heathercoxrichardson/p/december-23-2025?r=asnwm&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay


12/24/25 06:15 PM #18736    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah , Feliz Navidad, Joyeux Noël, Buon Natale, Feliz Natal, Wesołych Świąt, Vrolijk Kerstfeest, メリークリスマス, 聖誕快樂, З Різдвом Христовим, С Рождеством, Glædelig jul, শুভ বড়দিন, Nollaig Chridheil, ཡི་ཤུའི་འཁྲུངས་སྐར་དུས་ཆེན་དགའ་གཏོང་བྱེད, สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส

I sure hope I didn't miss anybody!

                    🎄🎄🎄


12/25/25 12:30 AM #18737    

 

Robert Hall

......und Frohe Weihnachten....

Merry Christmas everyone!

12/25/25 01:50 PM #18738    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Thanks Jack and Joan and Robert for the nice messages....I think Joan you included most of the possible holidays. Thank you. Hope everyone has a very Happy and Healthy New Year...I appreciate all of you so much.... joanie


12/25/25 08:23 PM #18739    

 

Jack Mallory

What many of us know from our own lives. I feel (a tiny bit) sorry for those who never learned this. And good to be reminded as we go into the new year.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/25/protests-effective-history-impact


12/25/25 09:12 PM #18740    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Thanks for that very good article about protests. I take heart in the fact that everyday Americans are protesting now in this horrible time of Trump. Love, Joanie

 


12/28/25 08:27 AM #18741    

 

Jack Mallory

Our government agencies and officials, from the Labor Department to Homeland Security to the "Department of War," from Rubio to Hegseth to Trump, increasingly and explicitly speak the language of Christian Nationalism. HCR wrote of this in her column yesterday. https://open.substack.com/pub/heathercoxrichardson/p/december-27-2025?r=asnwm&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay

This raises some obvious historical parallels, and with my usual cautions in mind I went to AI with a question. 

How did Hitler and Mussolini incorporate religion into their ideologies?

ChatGPT gave this answer, including similarities and differences, then and now:

This comparison can be made carefully and usefully without equating modern U.S. politics to fascism. The key is to focus on how religion is incorporated, not to claim identical regimes or outcomes. What follows is an analytical comparison of patterns, with clear limits and distinctions.

1. Shared Structural Pattern: Instrumentalization of Religion

Across Nazism, Italian Fascism, and MAGA-aligned right-wing movements, religion is not primarily treated as an independent moral authority but as:

  • A legitimizing symbol
  • A marker of in-group identity
  • A tool for mobilization and discipline

In all three cases, religion is most valued when it:

  • Reinforces nationalism
  • Justifies hierarchy
  • Sanctifies political authority

When religion challenges political power (e.g., on humility, care for outsiders, truthfulness), it becomes inconvenient.

2. Christianity as Identity vs. Christianity as Doctrine

Fascist regimes

  • Hitler: Christianity stripped of Jewish ethics, universalism, and moral constraint.
  • Mussolini: Catholicism preserved institutionally but subordinated politically.

MAGA-aligned ideology

  • Christianity often functions as a cultural identity rather than a theological one:
    • “Christian nation” as heritage
    • Christianity as boundary marker against secularism, liberalism, Islam, or pluralism
  • Core Christian teachings (e.g., loving enemies, welcoming strangers, humility) are often selectively emphasized or ignored.

This parallels what scholars call “civil religion” or “ethno-religion” rather than confessional faith.

3. Leader-Centered Faith Dynamics

Hitler and Mussolini

  • Cult of personality with quasi-religious reverence
  • Leader portrayed as uniquely chosen, infallible, or salvific

MAGA context

  • Not a state cult, but:
    • Trump frequently described in messianic or providential terms
    • Religious language reframed to justify personal loyalty
    • Moral failings reinterpreted as signs of strength or divine instrumentality

Importantly:

  • The U.S. has no legal requirement of religious loyalty to a leader.
  • But rhetorically, the pattern of personal authority overriding moral critique is comparable.

4. Religion as Shield Against Moral Accountability

A striking similarity lies in how religion is used to deflect criticism:

  • Hitler and Mussolini framed opposition as:
    • Anti-national
    • Anti-spiritual
    • Degenerate or corrupt
  • MAGA rhetoric often frames critics as:
    • “Anti-Christian”
    • “Anti-American”
    • Agents of secular or elite decay

In all cases, this collapses moral disagreement into civilizational threat, making compromise or critique feel illegitimate.

5. Crucial Differences (Where the Analogy Must Stop)

A. Institutional constraints

  • The U.S. retains:
    • Independent courts
    • Competitive elections
    • Free press
    • Religious pluralism
  • Fascist regimes abolished or captured these institutions.

B. Church autonomy

  • U.S. churches remain legally independent.
  • No state church, no enforced theology.
  • Clergy can and do oppose MAGA politics without imprisonment.

C. Violence and coercion

  • Fascist states relied on systematic political violence.
  • MAGA ideology includes rhetorical radicalization, but not state-organized repression.

These differences matter enormously.

6. Key Concept: “Christian Nationalism”

The closest modern parallel is not classical fascism but Christian nationalism, which:

  • Treats Christianity as inseparable from national identity
  • Blurs church–state boundaries symbolically
  • Frames political outcomes as divine mandate

This resembles Mussolini’s civic religion more than Hitler’s racial myth—but shares with Nazism a tendency to sacralize politics.

 

Bottom line

  • The resemblance is functional, not identical.
  • In all cases, religion is used to legitimize power rather than restrain it.
  • The greatest danger sign is not belief itself, but when politics becomes sacred and immune to moral critique.

 


12/29/25 03:53 PM #18742    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Hope you all are enjoying this joyous holiday season!

Clearly our president was a little grumpy. Did you hear? He tweeted 150 times on Christmas Day! Who has that kind of time, what with going to church, opening presents, enjoying your grandchildren and then laying into a big steak with the family all around.

If you haven't seen any of the tweets yet, here's a particularly puzzling one for celebrating Christ's birth. 

 

May be an image of text


12/29/25 06:01 PM #18743    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Yes, I saw that Christmas message from Trump. Wow that's the true spirit  of Christmas calling everyone sleazebags. They say that people often accuse others of being exactly what they are. Just saying....love, Joanie


12/30/25 08:42 AM #18744    

 

Jay Shackford

Strange dude, very strange. Perhaps someone in the MAGA crowd can explain.  

I was watching a documentary on "The Rise and Fall of Hitler" on the History or National Geographic channel the other day and discovered that some of Trump's rants were stolen directly from Hitler -- including "I alone can fix it."  Hitler used that phrase repeatedly during his rise to power in the early 1930s; 

One of the more interesting aspects of the Trump presidency will be years from now we will be interviewing the staffer sitting at the edge of Trump's bed, taking notes as Trump rants about his perceived enemies and then putting the President's thoughts down on paper to be posted for the world to see on "Truth Social" at 3 a.m. Remember, Trump can't write or use a computer. Who is this guy? He's the "Deep Throat" of the Trump presidency;  

My next post will be more heartwarming and a cheer and hope for the human race. going into the New Year. Happy New Year everyone. 


12/30/25 08:53 AM #18745    

 

Jay Shackford

Best Sentences of 2025

A win for humans

 

By Frank Bruni/The New York Times/Dec. 29, 2025

Mr. Bruni is a contributing Opinion writer who was on the staff of The Times for more than 25 years.

 

What a challenging year. Many of us struggle to make sense of what’s happening in America. We cope in different ways. Some spend more time in nature. Others retreat into books or the gym.

Still others turn to their keyboards, distilling this unruly world into words.

It’s their work that I honor today (and that I honor regularly in For the Love of Sentences, a feature of my Times Opinion newsletter). I’m revisiting especially fine passages of prose from the past 12 months.

You can go to the Best Sentences of 2023 here and of 2024 here. Those collections, like this one, wouldn’t exist without your help, so thank you for nominating the standout examples of current journalism and commentary that feed this feature.

And to everyone: Happy (almost) New Year.

In The Contrarian, David Litt questioned characterizations of President Trump’s furious first days back in the White House: “One CBS article about his immigration crackdown said Trump ‘invoked muscular presidential powers,’ which is a bit like saying Jeffrey Dahmer ‘displayed omnivorous taste.’” (Thanks to Tim Keenan of Denver and Mike Clark of Morelia, Mexico, for nominating this.)

In The New Yorker, Jill Lepore surveyed the destruction of the administration’s first three months: “Trump felled so much timber not because of the mightiness of his ax but because of the rot within the trees and the weakness of the wood.” (Stan Shatenstein, Montreal)

In The Globe and Mail of Toronto, Tony Keller suggested that Trump’s economic and diplomatic dealings amount to “a failed Hollywood blockbuster” with a nonsensical plot: “It‘s ‘2 Fast 2 Furious’ with no GPS, a steering wheel facing the rear window and a distracted driver who can’t stop going on about his William McKinley decals.” (Nadine Sherwin, Vancouver, British Columbia)

In Golfweek, Eamon Lynch reflected on Trump’s grifting: “There was a time when it would have been scandalous for a sitting U.S. president to use the office to serve his personal business interests, but that was back when America had attorneys general who didn’t think an emoluments clause was the disclaimer on a moisturizer.” (Kelly Parden, Wappingers Falls, N.Y., and Ben Scott, Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.)

 

In The Washington Post, Dana Milbank responded to some Republicans’ suggestion that the D.C. Metro be renamed the “Trump Train”: “It’s a great idea. Qatar will donate the subway cars, which will be powered by coal. Passengers will pay for fares with cryptocurrency after first showing proof of citizenship. And the trains will reverse themselves regularly and without warning — never quite reaching their original destination.” (Mary Ellen Maher-Harkins, Orwigsburg, Pa.)

Also in The Washington Post, Drew Goins analyzed the suggestion that Americans weather economic hardship by being less acquisitive: “One supposes that President Donald Trump is correct that Americans technically could scrape by with ‘two dolls’ instead of ‘30 dolls.’ The problem is that Americans like having 30 dolls, or 30 pairs of Nikes, or — perhaps not 30 TVs, but at least more than one, because sometimes you and all your dolls want to watch different programs.” (Esther S. Trakinski, Hillsdale, N.Y.)

In The Atlantic, David A. Graham processed the addition of “Trump” to “Kennedy” in the moniker for Washington’s premier performing arts center: “He asks not what he can do for his country, but what his country can name for him.” (Darrell Ing, Honolulu)

In The Wall Street Journal, Peggy Noonan explained Trump’s vigor: “He’s in good shape because he beats so many dead horses. It keeps the arms and shoulders up.” (Steven R. Strahler, Oak Park, Ill., and Stuart Math, Manhattan, among others)

In her newsletter, Joanne Carducci (a.k.a. JoJoFromJerz) scoffed at the peace prize that FIFA, the international soccer organization, awarded Trump: “It’s a participation trophy for geopolitical corruption. It’s so stupid, it makes my remaining sanity stand up, politely excuse itself and dive headfirst into oncoming traffic.” (Mike Rogers, Wilmington, N.C.)

 

In Esquire, Dave Holmes acknowledged that Senator Lindsey Graham was maybe joking that Trump should be the next pope — but maybe not: “You can’t be tongue-in-cheek when you are actively licking the boot. There is just not enough tongue for both jobs.” (Susan Fitzgerald, Las Cruces, N.M.)

In The Times, Maureen Dowd rolled her eyes at how Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth peddled the bombing of Iran: “It could not simply be an impressive mission; it had to be, as Hegseth said, ‘the most complex and secretive military operation in history.’ (Move over, D-Day and crossing the Delaware.)” (Marc Truitt, Sackville, New Brunswick)

 

Also in The Times, David Brooks explained many Republicans’ affinity for Russia’s president: “One of the reasons MAGA conservatives admire Putin is that they see him as an ally against their ultimate enemy — the ethnic studies program at Columbia.” (Jenny O’Farrell, Steamboat Springs, Colo., and Jessica Fitch, Corpus Christi, Texas, among many others)

And Glenn Thrush, Alan Feuer and Adam Goldman remarked on the right-wing ire that confronted Kash Patel and Pam Bondi as they failed to substantiate accusations they once made: “They are running what amounts to a conspiracy theory fulfillment center with unstocked shelves.” (Jeff Lebsack, Buffalo, and Marianne Painter, Tacoma, Wash., among others)

In The Toronto Star, Vinay Menon questioned a role proposed for military planes: “The operating cost of a C-130E can exceed $70,000 per hour. Using such an aircraft to ‘repatriate’ migrants is about as fiscally sound as taking your child to school in a hot-air balloon.” (Selina Abetkoff, Toronto)

In Slate, Jim Newell reported on the announcement by Senator Joni Ernst, Republican of Iowa, that she wouldn’t run for a third term in 2026: “She said that she wanted to spend more time with her family, but she didn’t specify which lobbying firm she meant.” (Harold Gotthelf, Fords, N.J.)

In The Deseret News, Addison Graham explained the lopsided logic of Senator Lisa Murkowski’s vote for Trump’s megabill: “Murkowski delivered a dessert bar to America’s billionaire class just to take home some Tootsie Rolls to Alaska.” (Jim Meehan, San Francisco)

 

Elsewhere Around the Globe

On the BBC website, Sean Coughlan charted the long mortification of the former Prince Andrew: “A few clicks on Google will find decades of stories raising doubts about his suitability, often accompanied by pictures of Andrew in a top hat, like a renegade Monopoly piece.” (Ellen Langille, Mount Dora, Fla., and Jane Wilhoite, Cary, N.C., among others)

In The Irish Times, Patrick Freyne reviewed a British dating show: “Meeting the contestants is also an opportunity to see job descriptions that the labor economist Richard Scarry never dreamed of. Ryan, for example, is a ‘tanning business owner.’ And Yolanda is ‘a Mel B impersonator.’ Fake tan and the Spice Girls are, of course, Britain’s main industries since Brexit.” (D.M. O’Donnell, Dublin)

In The New Yorker, Sam Knight contemplated Britain’s diminished place in the world: “Old empires are like old stars in the sky. You can’t tell whether the light actually burned out years ago.” (Margaret Wayne, Evanston, Ill., and Douglas R. Melin, Findlay, Ohio)

In The Washington Post, Jesús Rodríguez traced America’s history with the Gulf of Mexico: “‘Do we wish to acquire to our own confederacy any one or more of the Spanish provinces?’ Thomas Jefferson mused to President James Monroe in an 1823 letter, as if the Western Hemisphere was a West Elm catalog.” (Jennie Fogarty, Bethesda, Md.)

 

Elsewhere Around the Globe

On the BBC website, Sean Coughlan charted the long mortification of the former Prince Andrew: “A few clicks on Google will find decades of stories raising doubts about his suitability, often accompanied by pictures of Andrew in a top hat, like a renegade Monopoly piece.” (Ellen Langille, Mount Dora, Fla., and Jane Wilhoite, Cary, N.C., among others)

In The Irish Times, Patrick Freyne reviewed a British dating show: “Meeting the contestants is also an opportunity to see job descriptions that the labor economist Richard Scarry never dreamed of. Ryan, for example, is a ‘tanning business owner.’ And Yolanda is ‘a Mel B impersonator.’ Fake tan and the Spice Girls are, of course, Britain’s main industries since Brexit.” (D.M. O’Donnell, Dublin)

In The New Yorker, Sam Knight contemplated Britain’s diminished place in the world: “Old empires are like old stars in the sky. You can’t tell whether the light actually burned out years ago.” (Margaret Wayne, Evanston, Ill., and Douglas R. Melin, Findlay, Ohio)

In The Washington Post, Jesús Rodríguez traced America’s history with the Gulf of Mexico: “‘Do we wish to acquire to our own confederacy any one or more of the Spanish provinces?’ Thomas Jefferson mused to President James Monroe in an 1823 letter, as if the Western Hemisphere was a West Elm catalog.” (Jennie Fogarty, Bethesda, Md.)

 

Elsewhere Around the Globe

On the BBC website, Sean Coughlan charted the long mortification of the former Prince Andrew: “A few clicks on Google will find decades of stories raising doubts about his suitability, often accompanied by pictures of Andrew in a top hat, like a renegade Monopoly piece.” (Ellen Langille, Mount Dora, Fla., and Jane Wilhoite, Cary, N.C., among others)

In The Irish Times, Patrick Freyne reviewed a British dating show: “Meeting the contestants is also an opportunity to see job descriptions that the labor economist Richard Scarry never dreamed of. Ryan, for example, is a ‘tanning business owner.’ And Yolanda is ‘a Mel B impersonator.’ Fake tan and the Spice Girls are, of course, Britain’s main industries since Brexit.” (D.M. O’Donnell, Dublin)

In The New Yorker, Sam Knight contemplated Britain’s diminished place in the world: “Old empires are like old stars in the sky. You can’t tell whether the light actually burned out years ago.” (Margaret Wayne, Evanston, Ill., and Douglas R. Melin, Findlay, Ohio)

In The Washington Post, Jesús Rodríguez traced America’s history with the Gulf of Mexico: “‘Do we wish to acquire to our own confederacy any one or more of the Spanish provinces?’ Thomas Jefferson mused to President James Monroe in an 1823 letter, as if the Western Hemisphere was a West Elm catalog.” (Jennie Fogarty, Bethesda, Md.)

 

In The Atlantic, Helen Lewis reported from the Riyadh Comedy Festival, which paid big-name comedians big bucks to come to Saudi Arabia: “The festival is an outgrowth of Vision 2030, the grand Saudi project to prepare for the kingdom’s post-oil future. The old Saudi brand was ‘austere theocracy,’ but the new one is ‘fun, fun, fun, but still with beheading.’” (Harold Gotthelf, Fords, N.J.)

In The Times, Mia Leimkuhler mulled culinary marriages: “With all due respect to steak and lobster, I think the best surf ’n’ turf combination is chicken and anchovies. It’s an opposites-attract situation: The chicken is large and plump with a soft-spoken umami; it says: ‘How nice to meet you. I’m looking forward to working together.’ Anchovies, scrawny and electric with salty savoriness, kick in the door, press play on the boombox and say: ‘I’m here. Let’s do this.’” (Jo Wollschlaeger, Portland, Ore., and Sandy Shroyer, Montpellier, France)

Also in The Times, Matt Hongoltz-Hetling considered the importance of an annual communal feast to a Vermont town’s special fellowship: “Whether a vibrant community created the potluck or the potluck created a vibrant community is like asking which came first, the fried chicken or the deviled egg.” (Stacey Somppi, Cottonwood, Ariz., and Hillary Ellner, Durham, N.C., among others)

 

Ligaya Mishan extolled the egg’s uses in baking: “The whites alone, whipped steadily, foam up into a paralyzed surf and, when folded into batter — carefully, with as little effort as possible — bring a cake near levitation. Gravity ends here. This is how angels eat.” (Kate Kavanagh, Concord, Mass.)

And in a restaurant review, Ligaya extolled the eccentricity of a briny hideaway in Manhattan’s East Village: “To describe Smithereens as a New England-style seafood spot is like calling ‘Moby-Dick’ a story about fishing. The restaurant is darker and weirder, a love letter to the North Atlantic at its most ominous and brooding, written in seaweed and smashed lobster heads.” (Bob Altizer, Phoenix, and Jodie Wohl, Seattle, among others)

In The Boston Globe, Christopher Muther visited a New England roadway rest stop with food options beyond the norm and ordered the poutine: “I know what you’re thinking. ‘Rest stop poutine? Are you sure?’ Rest stop poutine sounds like the name of an indie rock band, or a French Canadian laxative.” (Jane Abbott, Hubbardston, Mass.)

In The Atlantic, Rachel Sugar questioned many Americans’ quests for a weeknight meal that they prepare, sort of, but that equals the ease of delivery or takeout: “You cannot have a meal that both is and is not homemade: Schrödinger’s salmon over couscous with broccoli rabe.” (Nan Valrance, Apex, N.C.)

In Switchboard, Celia Aniskovich described the wisdom — the religion — received by those who’ve graduated from Hot Dog University, an actual place for hot dog vendors. “They all know the cardinal rule, taught by their P.H.D. (that’s professor of hot dogs): no ketchup,” she wrote. “Unless you still ride a tricycle (and can prove it), you’re pregnant (we don’t argue with cravings) or it’s your wedding day (and we’d better see the dress).” She added that the school itself tells “a story about failure and second chances, hustle and hope, and the deeply American belief that a sidewalk, a spatula and a dream might still be enough.” (Dick Chady, Chapel Hill, N.C.)

 

In The San Jose Mercury News, Dieter Kurtenbach emphasized the importance of the “human flamethrower” Stephen Curry to the success of the Golden State Warriors this basketball season: “At 37, he looks like he’s aging backward, which is both a miracle of modern sports science and a testament to subsisting on a diet solely of opposing coaches’ tears.” (Geoffrey Burr, Cupertino, Calif.)

Kurtenbach separately defined the special shame of the three interceptions that the San Francisco 49ers quarterback Brock Purdy threw in a game against the Carolina Panthers: “These weren’t tipped balls or receiver errors or passes that were caught in the wind. They were floating, wobbling invitations to the Panthers’ secondary. He threw with the velocity of a heavy sigh.” (Gary Brauch, Los Altos Hills, Calif.)

In The Times, Sapna Maheshwari examined how many college athletes like Jake Dailey are tempted by lucrative social media opportunities: “Dailey, who has 90,000 TikTok followers and 32,000 on Instagram, said he would be thrilled to become a full-time influencer. Otherwise, he plans to become a dentist.” (Charles Kelley, Merrimack, N.H.)

 

In The Athletic, Brendan Quinn and Brendan Marks visited with the young Duke basketball sensation Cooper Flagg and his parents, Kelly and Ralph: “Mom has a tendency to dominate chats like this, cutting in like an 18-wheeler changing lanes with no signal. Cooper is said to get his basketball moxie from her.” (Bob Lahue, Moycullen, Ireland, and Maeve Sullivan, Durham, N.C., among others)

In The Wall Street Journal, Jason Gay rued the effect of obsessive replays on the determination of what, in pro football, constitutes a catch. “It’s the affliction of overthinking: If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, wait, hold on, it must be a chandelier,” he wrote. “It’s further evidence humans can ruin the spirit of anything, if given the time and technology.” (Bill Sclafani, Rockport, Mass.)

In The Washington Post, Chelsea Janes paid fitting — no, obligatory — tribute to the masterpiece of a baseball game that Shohei Ohtani played on the cusp of the World Series: “This is Beethoven at a piano. This is Shakespeare with a quill. This is Michael Jordan in the finals. This is Tiger Woods in Sunday red. This is too good to be true with no reason to doubt it. This is the beginning of every baseball conversation and the end of the debate: Shohei Ohtani is the best baseball player who has ever played the game, the most talented hitter and pitcher of an era in which data and nutrition have made an everyman’s sport a game for superhumans.” (Jonathan Weker of Montpelier, Vt., and Todd Lowe, Anchorage, Ky.)

In The Washington Post, Mark Lasswell traced the lineage of a polarizing punctuation mark: “Too demure to be a colon but more assertive than a comma, the semicolon was introduced in 1494 by Venetian printer and publisher Aldus Manutius. What a useful little tool it has been in its primary role of inserting a graceful pause between two related independent clauses, as in: ‘R.F.K. Jr. came to my house; he tore out the medicine cabinet with a crowbar.’” (Dorit Suffness, Dallas, and Nancy Loe, San Luis Obispo, Calif., among others)

Also in The Washington Post, Ron Charles assessed “The Little Book of Bitcoin,” by the supremely self-confident pitchman Anthony Scaramucci: “In one passage, he touts the convenience of transporting $500 million in Bitcoin on a thumb drive, which is the best news I’ve heard since my yacht got a new helipad.” (Stephen S. Power, Maplewood, N.J., and Hannah Reich, Queens, among others)

Charles also observed that the scolds who ban books have taken issue with “Maurice Sendak’s ‘In the Night Kitchen,’ which has been proven in the state of Florida to turn straight white Christian boys into polygender Marxists who eat only quinoa.” (Jill Gaither, St. Louis, and John Jacoby, North Andover, Mass.)

In The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Philip Martin praised the writer Walter Isaacson’s depictions of the authors of the Declaration of Independence in his new book, “The Greatest Sentence Ever Written,” about the document’s opening words: “He doesn’t carve them into monuments. He lets them breathe as men at work, leaning over a draft, arguing about commas, listening for cadence.” Those founding fathers believed “that words, if built well, can hold our contradictions long enough for us to grow into them.” (Nancy Bellhouse May, Little Rock, Ark.)

In The Times, John McWhorter analyzed the president’s loopy language: “Even Trump’s most positive-sounding coinages are acts of a certain kind of verbal aggression. I sometimes stop to marvel that the House passed something with the actual official title the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act. That goofy bark of a name is a boisterous clap back against opposing views, an attempt to drown out inconvenient facts with braggadocio. It is a linguistic snap of the locker room towel.” (Matt Masiero, Richmond, Mass., and Sue Hudson, Simi Valley, Calif., among many others)

Also in The Times, Dwight Garner noted a lacuna in “Sister Europe,” by Nell Zink: “No real sex takes place in this novel, though it’s gently pervy, like Mr. Whipple squeezing the Charmin.” (John Jacoby, North Andover, Mass.)

 

Altitude, Attitude, Internment and A.I.

In The Boston Globe, Beth Teitell scaled the pampering heights of a luxury high-rise: “It was frigid out, and so icy that all over town pedestrians were tumbling. But on the 35th floor of the Millennium Residences at Winthrop Center, life felt as easy as a summer afternoon, and Richard Baumert was marveling at the lap pool: 75 feet long, surrounded by floor-to-ceiling windows, its water a bewitching shade of … let’s call it concierge blue.” (Emily Andreano, Swampscott, Mass.)

In The Pickup, John Paul Brammer took issue with a proposal to build the tallest skyscraper in the United States in flat Oklahoma City: “I don’t mean to say OKC doesn’t deserve iconic architecture. Far from! I simply think that buildings should reflect the character of a place, like how Santa Fe is all adobe and how Dallas looks designed by a sentient Ford F-150.” (Perry Sailor, Longmont, Colo.)

In The Times, Kevin Roose worried that when it comes to regulations, the stately metabolism of institutions is no match for the velocity of A.I.: “It feels, at times, like watching policymakers on horseback, struggling to install seatbelts on a passing Lamborghini.” (Conrad Macina, Landing, N.J.)

 

Also in The Times, Kwame Anthony Appiah sounded a hopeful note for movie scripts created by flesh-and-blood humans rather than A.I.: “There will always be an audience for work that spurns the template — for writers who, shall we say, think outside the bot.” (Alfred Sainato, Metuchen, N.J.)

And Andi Zeisler appraised the stage persona of the pop star Sabrina Carpenter: “She presents as a half-pint pinup doll whose doe eyes, big Bardot hair and frothy, lingerie-inspired costumes evoke two iconic Hollywoods (Old, and Frederick’s of).” (David Baer, Concord, Calif., and Ilene V. Smith, Manhattan)

In The Wall Street Journal, Dan Neil recounted a spin in a luxury convertible and conceded the mismatch of a chariot with few miles on it and a charioteer with many: “For a man of my age and grooming to rumble through downtown Palm Springs alone in a drop-top Aston Martin the color of Superman’s eyes … well, it suggests I’m looking for a party. If anything, I’m just looking for a bathroom.” (Trevor Hale, Washington, and Saul Himelfarb, Baltimore)

 

In The Autopian, Matt Hardigree explained one carmaker’s advantage: “You don’t buy a Subaru so much as you ascend into your final form as an outdoorsy Subaru owner when a ray of light beams down from the nearest REI, and all your clothes vanish from your body and are replaced by Patagonia.” (Carol Goland, Granville, Ohio)

In her newsletter, Fresh Hell, Tina Brown reacted to an invitation from someone decades younger than she: “A friend of mine in her 40s hosted a birthday party last week at New York’s most glamorous new club with the dress code of ‘drop-dead sexy,’ which gave me a burst of insecurity. People in my circle are very good at ‘drop dead.’ Sexy, not so much.” (Rich Moche, Brookline, Mass.)

In The New Yorker, Burkhard Bilger shared dental details: “My bottom teeth lean this way and that in a wandering line, like first graders on a field trip.” (Max Sinclair, DeKalb, Ill., and Ken Logsdon, Columbia, Mo., among others)

In The Times, James Hamblin parodied the typical message and script of a television drug ad: “You will frolic on the beach at sunset psoriasis-free, with a golden retriever, smiling into the distance. You also may experience sudden loss of cardiac function, seizures of the arms or intermittent explosive ear discharge. Talk to your doctor.” (Susan Casey, Palm City, Fla.)

Also in The Times, Vanessa Friedman weighed in on fuselage fashion: “The way we dress to fly suggests we’ve surrendered to the mortification of the experience. And yet there is nothing worse than disembarking from a plane in full rumple, waiting for your bags at the luggage carousel and running into someone you know while looking like the most crushed version of yourself.” (Rob Reilly, Darien, Conn.)

In The Washington Post, Robin Givhan made a crucial distinction: “Patriotism is like the love that a parent has for a child; nationalism is akin to believing that one’s child can do no wrong.” (David Ballard, Reston, Va.)

In the quarterly journal Sapir, Bret Stephens surrendered to the heavily partisan slant of so much cable television news: “To demand scrupulous impartiality on their broadcasts is like expecting fancy linens at a Motel 6.” (Naomi Lerner, Short Hills, N.J.)

In The Dispatch, Kevin D. Williamson gave thanks for academia, despite its flaws: “The American university system is the envy of the world, and we are burning it down because there’s a couple of nonbinary gender studies professors at Bryn Mawr who say crazy stuff from time to time and there is a brain-dead gaggle of Jew-hating weirdos at Columbia. Of course, there is room for reform. But you don’t have to love every feather on the goose when it is laying golden eggs.” (Dan Markovitz, Corte Madera, Calif.)

 

In The BMJ, Kamran Abassi composed a eulogy for honest, factual information. “We live in a world of lies, damned lies, and A.I. hallucinations,” he wrote. “A lie, they say, travels halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on. Today, a lie travels so fast that the truth might as well stay in bed.” (Harold Goll, Baltimore)

In The Times, A.O. Scott sang a similar song: “Occam’s razor, the venerable philosophical principle that the truest explanation is likely to be the simplest, has been thrown away. We’re living in the age of Occam’s chain saw, when the preferred answer is the one that makes the loudest noise and generates the most debris.” (Charles Kelley, Merrimack, N.H., and Trisha Houser, Durham, N.C., among others)

Also in The Times, Terry Tempest Williams described an effect that time in America’s national parks — in nature — can have. “Public lands are our public commons, breathing spaces in a country that is increasingly holding its breath,” she wrote, adding, “We stand before a giant sequoia and remember the size of our hearts instead of the weight of our egos.”

To nominate favorite bits of recent writing from The Times or other publications to be mentioned in For the Love of Sentences, please email me here and include your name and place of residence.

 

12/30/25 10:17 AM #18746    

 

Jack Mallory

Another ChatGPT inquiry, as I wake to drone strikes inside Venezuela. I asked for a list of countries the US has attacked since we were defeated in Vietnam--1975. 
 

ChatGPT’s response:

Here’s a **chronological list of countries where the United States has carried out military attacks, interventions, or sustained use of force since 1975** involving **aircraft (including manned airstrikes and drones), naval forces, or ground troops**. These entries are based on well-documented military actions (wars, invasions, air/sea strikes, drone campaigns) acknowledged by governments and major sources.  
I’ve also included a **Venezuela section** to explain recent developments.

---

## 🇺🇸 **Chronological List (1975–Present)**

**1979–1980s**
- **Nicaragua** – U.S. supported Contra forces against the Sandinista government during the 1980s (military aid and covert action with air/ground support — widely documented though not a formal invasion).  [oai_citation:0‡China Daily Global](https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202104/11/WS6072df78a31024ad0bab4b99.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Grenada** – U.S. invasion (Operation Urgent Fury) in **1983**, deploying ground troops and aircraft to overthrow the Marxist government.  [oai_citation:1‡Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Grenada?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Libya**
  - **1986**: U.S. air strikes (Operation El Dorado Canyon) targeting Libyan military and infrastructure.  [oai_citation:2‡Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_United_States_bombing_of_Libya?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
  - **Late 1980s**: U.S. naval forces engaged Libya (e.g., Gulf of Sidra incidents).  [oai_citation:3‡Victor Mochere](https://victormochere.com/foreign-interventions-by-the-united-states?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

**1990s**
- **Panama** – U.S. invasion (Operation Just Cause) **1989–1990** to overthrow Manuel Noriega.  [oai_citation:4‡en.humanrights.cn](https://en.humanrights.cn/2021/04/09/71275f234e4447f58c8d6794a1ca3d9b.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Gulf War (Iraq & Kuwait)** – **1990–1991** large U.S./coalition air and ground campaign liberating Kuwait.  [oai_citation:5‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Somalia** – U.S. ground and air operations **1992–1995** as part of UN humanitarian mission and combat against factions.  [oai_citation:6‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Bosnia and Herzegovina** – U.S./NATO air operations in **1994–1995** during the Bosnian War.  [oai_citation:7‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Kosovo (Serbia/Yugoslavia)** – **1998–1999** U.S. participated in NATO air campaign.  [oai_citation:8‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

**2000s**
- **Afghanistan** – **2001–2021** invasion and war after 9/11; U.S. aircraft, drones, and ground troops fought the Taliban and al-Qaeda.  [oai_citation:9‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Iraq**
  - **2003–2011** invasion and occupation.  [oai_citation:10‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
  - **2014–2021** U.S. air and advisory operations against ISIS.  [oai_citation:11‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Pakistan** – Extensive drone strikes and special operations against militants **mid-2000s–2018** (part of the broader war on terror).  [oai_citation:12‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Yemen** – U.S. drone and airstrike campaign against AQAP and later ISIL affiliates **mid-2000s–present**.  [oai_citation:13‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Somalia (second phase)** – U.S. drone strikes and limited deployments renewed **2007–present**.  [oai_citation:14‡Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_intervention_in_Somalia_%282007%E2%80%93present%29?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

**2010s**
- **Libya (2011)** – U.S. aircraft and naval forces participated in NATO operation (Operation Odyssey Dawn) enforcing a no-fly zone and striking Gaddafi forces.  [oai_citation:15‡Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Odyssey_Dawn?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Syria** – From **2014–present**, U.S. airstrikes and special forces in operations against ISIS and other armed groups.  [oai_citation:16‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Iraq (continuing)** – Ongoing U.S. air and advisory operations against ISIS continuation from 2014 onwards.  [oai_citation:17‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

**2020s**
- **Somalia (ongoing)** – U.S. continues drone strikes against extremist groups.  [oai_citation:18‡Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_intervention_in_Somalia_%282007%E2%80%93present%29?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **Yemen (ongoing)** – Continued involvement through strikes and support roles.  [oai_citation:19‡MR Online](https://mronline.org/2022/09/16/u-s-launched-251-military-interventions-since-1991-and-469-since-1798/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

---

## 🇻🇪 **What Happened with Venezuela? (2025 Update)**

In **2025**, the U.S. escalated military actions in relation to Venezuela:

- **Naval and air strikes** against suspected drug trafficking vessels associated with Venezuelan groups have been publicly acknowledged by U.S. officials; these operations have resulted in fatalities and have been justified by the U.S. as counter-drug actions.  [oai_citation:20‡Politico](https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/02/navy-strike-drug-vessel-venezuela-00540325?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- **President Trump confirmed** the U.S. authorized CIA covert operations inside Venezuela targeting drug trafficking and related threats.  [oai_citation:21‡AP News](https://apnews.com/article/ecb477ac7f07d5beaf48d44dee75c5e5?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- In **December 2025**, the U.S. **announced a strike on a dock area in Venezuela allegedly used for drug operations**, possibly involving either military or intelligence units, marking what is described as the first known land-based U.S. attack inside Venezuela’s territory.  [oai_citation:22‡Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-venezuelan-officials-still-mum-trumps-mention-action-against-drug-boat-2025-12-29/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
- These actions have significantly heightened tensions, drawn **international legal criticism**, and yielded debate over sovereignty and international law.  [oai_citation:23‡Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/un-experts-say-us-strikes-against-venezuela-international-waters-amount-2025-10-21/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

**Note:** Prior to 2025, there was **not** a widely acknowledged full-scale U.S. airstrike or invasion of Venezuelan sovereign territory; most actions cited were **covert, maritime strikes, or diplomatic/economic pressure** until the recent events. The 2025 operations represent a *notable escalation* that many analysts see as new in the pattern of U.S. force directly impacting Venezuelan soil or coastal infrastructure.  [oai_citation:24‡Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-venezuelan-officials-still-mum-trumps-mention-action-against-drug-boat-2025-12-29/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

---

## 🧠 **Important Clarifications**
- This list **excludes covert intelligence operations** lacking acknowledged use of military force unless that force is confirmed (e.g., drone strikes announced by U.S. authorities).  
- It also **doesn’t include purely advisory or training missions** with no associated strikes or combat force employment.  
- Many interventions are subject to debate over legality, scale, and classification.  
- The 2025 Venezuela events are **ongoing and evolving**; reporting may change as more details emerge.  [oai_citation:25‡Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-venezuelan-officials-still-mum-trumps-mention-action-against-drug-boat-2025-12-29/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

---

If you’d like, I can convert this into a **timeline with dates and types of operations (airstrikes, ground invasion, drone campaigns)** or visualize it by **region (Middle East, Africa, Americas, Europe)**.


 


12/31/25 06:53 AM #18747    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Thank you Jay and Jack for your very good posts. Jay, that is quite a list of comments about the Trump Presidency...thank you and Jack, what a good review you posted. Trump who keeps demanding he get the Nobel Peace Prize, is working hard to create death and destruction everywhere, domestically and abroad. Love, Joanie


12/31/25 07:29 AM #18748    

 

Jack Mallory

I wish it were just Trump, Joanie. ChatGPT tells us:

U.S. Presidents Since 1975 and Use of Force

Gerald Ford (1974–1977)

  • Cambodia (1975) – Mayaguez incident: U.S. Marines, aircraft, and naval forces used against Cambodia.
    ➡️ Used force

Jimmy Carter (1977–1981)

  • Iran (1980) – Operation Eagle Claw: military incursion and aircraft losses during the hostage rescue attempt.
    ➡️ Used force

Ronald Reagan (1981–1989)

  • Grenada (1983) – invasion
  • Libya (1986) – air strikes
    ➡️ Used force

George H. W. Bush (1989–1993)

  • Panama (1989) – invasion
  • Iraq (1991) – Gulf War
    ➡️ Used force

Bill Clinton (1993–2001)

  • Somalia (1993) – combat operations
  • Bosnia (1995) – NATO air war
  • Serbia/Kosovo (1999) – NATO air campaign
  • Iraq (1990s) – repeated airstrikes
    ➡️ Used force

George W. Bush (2001–2009)

  • Afghanistan (2001) – invasion
  • Iraq (2003) – invasion
    ➡️ Used force

Barack Obama (2009–2017)

  • Libya (2011) – air and naval strikes
  • Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia – extensive air and drone campaigns
    ➡️ Used force

Donald Trump (2017–2021)

  • Syria (2017, 2018) – missile strikes
  • Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen – continued air/drone strikes
    ➡️ Used force

Joe Biden (2021–2025)

  • Syria (multiple years) – airstrikes
  • Iraq (2021–2024) – airstrikes
  • Yemen (2024) – strikes against Houthi targets
  • Afghanistan (2021) – airstrike during withdrawal
    ➡️ Used force

*******

Out the back door yesterday.


 


12/31/25 07:39 AM #18749    

 

Jack Mallory

Minnesota isn't usually noted for its sunsets, but they are often quite striking. Lots of horizon. 
 




12/31/25 08:55 AM #18750    

 

Jay Shackford

Donald Trump’s 

Golden Age of Awful

A damage assessment of the President’s first year back in office

By Susan Glasser/The New Yorker/Dec. 30, 2025

No matter how low one’s expectations were for 2025, the most striking thing about the year when Donald Trump became President again is how much worse it turned out to be.

Did we anticipate that Trump would come back to office wanting to rule as a king, consumed by revenge and retribution, and encouraged by sycophants and yes-men who would insure that he faced few of the constraints that hampered him in his first term? Yes, but now we know that bracing for the worst did not make the inevitable any less painful. In the future, historians will struggle to describe that feeling, particular to this Trump era, of being prepared for the bad, crazy, and disruptive things that he would do, and yet also totally, utterly shocked by them.

A partial catalogue of the horrors of 2025 that not even the most prescient Trump-watcher could claim to have fully predicted: gutting cancer research in the name of expurgating diversity programs from the nation’s universities. Shutting the door to refugees—except for white Afrikaners, from South Africa. Empowering the world’s richest man to cut off funding for the world’s poorest children. Welcoming Vladimir Putin on a red carpet at an American Air Force base. Razing the East Wing of the White House, without warning, on an October morning. Alienating pretty much the entirety of Canada.

Your list might be different from mine. There is so much from which to choose. And that is the point.

Yet the biggest disappointment of 2025 may well have been not what Trump did but how so many let it happen. Trump has always been a mirror for other people’s souls, an X-ray revealing America’s dysfunction. If this was a test, there were more failing grades than we could have imagined.

On the first day of his second term, the President pardoned more than fifteen hundred violent rioters who sacked their own U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, in a vain effort to overturn Trump’s 2020 election defeat. Even his Vice-President, J. D. Vance, had said that this was something that “obviously” shouldn’t happen; Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, later admitted that she had lobbied him not to go that far. But Trump didn’t listen. He was putting America on notice. The first outrage was a sneak preview of those to come: if there was a choice to be made, he would invariably opt for the most shocking, destructive, or corrupt option. And who was going to stop him?

This is why any obituary for 2025 requires a special shout-out to those whose craven folding to Trump might well have proved to be among the biggest bad surprises of the year—the law-firm managing partners and corporate executives and technology tycoons who decided to pay protection money to the President rather than stand up for the rule of law that enabled their great success in the first place. Eight long years ago, the story of the first year of Trump’s first term was the rearguard struggle over control of the Republican Party; this time, with Trump having long ago won the battle for the G.O.P., he has extended his hostile takeover far beyond the realm of partisan politics, advancing a vision of breathtaking personal power in which the President claims the right to determine everything from what appears on the nightly news to the place names on our maps to which laws passed by Congress should be followed and which can be ignored.

Just a year ago, it was still possible to envision a different course for Trump’s second term—to imagine that, while the President himself might really mean to carry through with his most radical plans, there remained strong forces in society to resist him. Republican leaders in Congress and the Trump-appointed conservative majority on the Supreme Court may yet prove to be something other than the willing handmaidens of democracy’s demise, but they have so far failed to do so. This past year’s disruptions are as much their work as Trump’s; without their acquiescence, as passive or unwilling as it has been at times, many of Trump’s most extreme acts would not have been possible. Just think about Senator Bill Cassidy, of Louisiana, a medical doctor who made much of the “assurances” he extracted from Trump’s vaccine-denying nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Kennedy won his confirmation vote, then broke the pledges he had made to get it. Cassidy has, in the tradition of the Senate, been deeply concerned ever since.

And so Trump sits in the White House, largely unchecked, live-streaming his manic attack on the Deep State for hours a day, an archetypal mad emperor whose courtiers will keep praising him no matter how fat, ugly, or naked he turns out to be. He has become our national micromanager-in-chief, renovating the world economy with a theological belief in the magic of tariffs one minute, renaming the Kennedy Center for himself the next; he is everywhere all at once, ordering up prosecutions of his political enemies on his social-media feed, personally demanding tribute from C.E.O.s and princes, waging unceasing war on wind farms and low-water-pressure showerheads. Who knew, when he spoke of a new “golden age” in his Inaugural Address back in January, that he meant it literally, as a preview of his plans for redecorating the White House? Whatever he does, he can count on the flattery of followers who assure him, as his golf buddy turned international peace negotiator Steve Witkoff did this fall, that he is “the greatest President in American history.”

My colleague Jane Mayer recently made an observation that sums up why it’s been so difficult to write, or even think, about what’s happening in Washington this year: it’s hard to be so angry all of the time. Most of us are simply not used to being this frequently upset, enraged, infuriated, or just plain disgusted by public occurrences. And yet that was the essential condition of engaging with the state of Trump’s America in 2025. Whenever one tuned into the day’s events, there was sure to be another grotesque act of personal aggrandizement or self-enrichment on the part of the President, another billionaire sucking up to him, another brazen act of lawlessness from those who are charged with executing our laws. The year’s signature social-media experience was being confronted by all those videos of poor souls being dragged out of their cars and beaten by masked thugs acting in the name of the government. To watch or not—that was the question. It was all so inescapable and emotionally manipulative: upsetting by design.

The shock videos are just part of it. Remember the gay Venezuelan makeup artist who was sent to El Salvador’s most infamous prison because he had made the mistake of seeking asylum in the U.S.? Or the countless U.S. citizens, some of them small children, who have been caught up by Stephen Miller’s goon squads? Is it better or worse to know that Trump wanted to do even more to fulfill his campaign-trail vow of “mass deportations now,” with his Administration admitting earlier this month that it had fallen far short of its stated goal of a million people shipped out of the country? The more than six hundred thousand deportations in 2025 announced by his Department of Homeland Security is still, by far, the largest number ever.

This is true of many of his other radical plans as well. For all the shock and awe of Elon Musk’s campaign to slash government spending, the federal government will end 2025 with pretty much the same enormous budget deficit that it had before—a far cry from the two trillion dollars in savings Musk initially promised. Yet what he accomplished in the few months before his inevitable falling out with Trump was an unspeakable amount of human trauma, reducing the government workforce by some two hundred and fifty thousand employees, slashing foreign aid to needy children and starving families, ending programs and careers with little regard for who or what or why.

The problem here is that taking stock of all that Trump has done in 2025 means confronting the new reality of an America where the raw and arbitrary exercise of power for its own sake is both possible and permissible. It can happen here, we now know, because it is happening here.

As wretched as this year has been, many of the President’s critics have decided that it is at least ending on a positive note. They discern a whiff of impending irrelevance in our lame-duck septuagenarian President. And there is no doubt that Trump today faces a set of positively Biden-esque problems, from persistent inflation to sagging approval ratings. Some sixty per cent of Americans now disapprove of his Presidency. Prospects for the 2026 midterms look bad for him and his party.

But that is next year’s story. For now, I’m still stuck on the damage assessment from what Trump has already wrought since his return to the Presidency in 2025. If ever there were a year whose end could not come soon enough, this was it. I’d like to dance on its grave and drink buckets of champagne in honor of its demise. Happy New Year. Finally, there is something to celebrate. 


12/31/25 09:55 AM #18751    

 

Jack Mallory

Trump admin attack details for Joanie, and an addendum to Glasser's "damages." Thnx, Jay--I especially liked her line, "Trump has always been a mirror for other people’s souls."

Nobel Peace prize?

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/31/how-many-countries-has-trump-bombed-in-2025


01/01/26 11:37 AM #18752    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Jack, you are so correct that so many past Presidents have taken us to war. I was forcusing on Trump as he unfortnately the President now. He holds a special place as the cruelest President and most self serving of all time. That is his first place prize. Love, Joanie. On second thought the outcomes of the wars result in extreme cruelty such as the Iraq war under Bush where thousands died.


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  

agape