header 1
header 2
header 3

Message Forum - GENERAL

Welcome to the Bethesda Chevy Chase High School Message Forum.

The message forum is an ongoing dialogue between classmates. There are no items, topics, subtopics, etc.

Forums work when people participate - so don't be bashful! Click the "Post Message" button to add your entry to the forum.


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

01/17/24 07:49 AM #16784    

 

Jack Mallory

Heather Cox Richardson is taking her cues from Jay! Referring to the Iowa caucuses, she said:

"Turnout was much lower than expected, with only about 110,000 people voting. That’s about 15% of Iowa’s three quarters of a million registered Republicans out of a population of just over 3 million people . . .

"The Iowa results pretty much told us what we already knew. Trump remains the dominant leader of the hard-right older Republicans who turn out for caucuses, but is so generally unpopular that 49% of Iowa caucusgoers—the party’s most dedicated supporters in a deeply Republican state—chose someone else. The Trump base is older—entry polls showed that only 27% of yesterday’s voters were under the age of 50—and Trump won most handily in the rural, white counties that look least like the rest of the country. His greatest increase in support since 2016 came among white evangelicals.

 HCR went on to note that:

"That support from those who claim fervent religious beliefs seems an odd fit with the candidate, who was in a federal courtroom in New York City today for the start of a trial to determine the additional damages he owes writer E. Jean Carroll for defaming her after she said he raped her in the 1990s, claiming she was lying to sell books. Carroll sued him in 2019, but the case has been delayed as Trump argued that he had presidential immunity for his comments.

"While it was delayed, in May 2023 a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse in a second civil trial known as Carroll II. The jury ordered Trump to pay Carroll $5 million. When Trump’s team countersued Carroll for defamation, saying the jury had found him liable not for rape, but for sexual abuse, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan said Carroll’s words were 'substantially true.' Kaplan made it clear that New York law defines rape very narrowly. He said 'the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact…‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’’ 'The jury,' he wrote, 'found that Mr. Trump forcibly penetrated her vagina.'"

So the Republican candidate for President of the United States, the candidate of the party that likes to think of itself as the law and order party, is what we "commonly understand" to be a rapist.


01/17/24 01:21 PM #16785    

 

Glen Hirose

           10 degrees in Rockville this morning

              Is It Possible To Make A Stack Of Pancakes With No Eggs?  Starbucks raises prices of coffee drinks

              Problem solved...

 


01/17/24 04:17 PM #16786    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Jack, that dog does have some deep thoughts going on. I agree with Steven speculating on some of the pups possible reflections.

Glen, I felt warmed up looking at the yunny food and hot coffee. Thanks!!! Love your posts.love, Joanie

01/18/24 09:55 AM #16787    

 

Jack Mallory

Interesting and revealing article by a Republican analyst and publisher:


I'll just post a couple of examples of the cameos Longwell includes in the article. Remember, these are the people Trump described as "the best," not part of his "deep state" fantasy.



https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/01/18/opinion/trump-cabinet-election-2024.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=a-cb
 


01/18/24 01:12 PM #16788    

 

Jay Shackford

An Open Letter to Nikki Haley/The Last Woman Standing 

By Dead-Center Shacks

 

Come on, Nikki!  

 

Failing to acknowledge “slavery” as the cause of the Civil War and your willingness to pardon Donald Trump for his many crimes are blunders that I’ve been willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.  I will even forgive you for playing the race card in your comments about Vice President Kamala Harris in your Monday night speech following the Iowa caucuses.    But when you say that “you haven’t been paying attention” to the E. Jean Carroll civil case in New York City where Trump has already been found guilty of rape and fined $5 million is truly testing my patience.    

 

Every morning and late at night you are briefed by your top campaign staff on the major events of the day and the headlines dominating television and print media as well as the Internet.  Donald Trump’s outrageous behavior at Jean Carroll’s civil trial and his posts on social media further defaming and lying about Jean Carroll, the judge, the court and everyone else associated with the case have been headline issues that your top staff has been bringing to your attention.  So don’t claim ignorance as an excuse and expect to get away with it. And don’t think your current campaign of not offending MAGA Republicans is putting you in a great position to run for President in 2028.  That dog won’t hunt. 

 

Look, you are the one Republican candidate (the last woman standing) that has a chance to challenge Trump on the issue of “character” and whether he is fit to serve again as President.  Yes, it’s a long shot,  but it’s a shot worth taking.  There’s nothing Trump hates more than being challenged by a strong woman — particularly a woman of color.  By doing the right thing, Nikki, you could also lead and bolster the confidence of other conservative, small government, strong defense non-MAGA Republicans to also stand up to Trump and his authoritarian, un-American and psychotic ways.  

 

Otherwise, Donald Trump will have a free ride to the finish line, claiming not only the GOP presidential nomination but also having a good chance at becoming the first convicted felon ever elected as President of the United States.  

 

Do the right thing, Nikki.  

 

 

 


01/19/24 06:55 AM #16789    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Jay, thank you for your post. I don't think Niki will do the right thing. She talks around an issue so as not to offend the MAGA group but then offends everyone else. I think sometimes there is strength in convictions but instead she is afraid of losing votes. After she is asked a question, its often hard to know what her answer is because she is not being honest. I was listening to David Plouffe last night, the former campaign manager for Obama, and he said that Niki appears weak and that is not a way to have a strong finish for New Hampshire. He felt that if she doesn't win New Hampshire her campaign is over. It looks more and more like Trump will soon be the nominee and those of us who care about Democracy and so much more should do everything we can to help Biden win. Love, Joanie


01/19/24 10:11 AM #16790    

 

Jay Shackford

 

 

The Last Best Hope for Challenging Trump 

 Joanie, you might be right  about Nikki Haley lacking the political courage over the next four days to challenge Donald Trump on the character issue and his.bat-shit crazy authoritarian views on the role and power of the presidency.  In one of his latest court cases regarding presidential immunity, Trump's lawyers argued that the President could order Seal Team 6 to assassinate his political rivals and the President was immune from prosecution unless he was first impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate.  In a post on Social Media, the President even went further, saying all Presidents had "absolute immunity" from prosecution even if they "crossed the line." Now, if that doesn't define a dictatorial state, I don't know what does. 

Or read Jack's post on what Mark MIlley and John Bolton -- two very conservative thinkers who served in the Trump administration -- had to say about the dangers of a second term Trump presidency.  Among other things, Trump is likely to pull out of NATO, abandon Ukraine, rekindle the discussion about repealing Obama care now providing basic health to 21 million Americans, use the Justice Department to go after his opponents in politics, the media, colleges and universities and elsewhere, and cut social programs to the bone to pay for the record $8 trillion Trump added to the national debt during his first term in office.  Remember, Trump once said during his first term,  "What's the use of having nuclear weapons if you can't use them."

That's what we are talking about and that's what Nikki should be talking about during her final campaign stops in New Hampshire.  She still has time to pull off an upset among fiercely independent voters in New Hampshire.  In Nikki, I'm not looking for perfection, but she is the last best hope for challenging Trump for the GOP nomination.  Hey Nikki, if you are in a tough battle, at least go down fighting. At this critical turning point in the campaign, it's worth remembering the old political adage: "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." 

Hey Jack, I loved the dog picture, too.  

 

 

 

 

 


01/19/24 12:16 PM #16791    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Good letter to the Post Jay. I hope they feel the same way. I might add that Trump's comments on social media the other day went even further. In addition to demanding "absolute immunity," he also compared himself to "rogue cops" who get away with murder sometimes. That's not quite accurate.......but nevertheless, he thinks he should "get away" with his misdeeds (as he has his whole life). The fact that he's admitting them is astonishing! He said: "EVEN EVENTS THAT ‘CROSS THE LINE’ MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY," What more do you need as an admission? 

With this line of thinking, would he endorse Biden sending troops to Mar a Lago to beat him up or arrest him because Biden is the president and has ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY? The man doesn't even think about what he's demanding! God help us all!


01/19/24 03:09 PM #16792    

 

Jack Mallory

"With this line of thinking, would he endorse Biden sending troops to Mar a Lago to beat him up or arrest him because Biden is the president and has ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY?"

 

Well, it is tempting . . . 
 

**********

Bitter cold, with snow and wind chills in the teens and single digits. But ice jewels forming as the river goes up and down. 
 


 



 


01/19/24 09:48 PM #16793    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Jack the pictures are wonderful. I especially love the first one with the light between the trees.

Jay, now Nicki Haley can't seem to mention that there has been racism in this country. She is saying something like that is not the intent. Oh, well, let's see how things go in New Hampshire. Love, Joanie


01/20/24 11:48 AM #16794    

 

Jay Shackford

TRUMP ISN’T EVEN HIDING HIS PLANS TO GO “ROGUE”

On the week when the Republican nomination fight began—and just about ended.

By Susan B. Glasser 

January 18, 2024

 

 

That was fast. Donald Trump’s victory in the Iowa caucuses was so big that the story now is not so much who might win next week’s first-in-the-nation New Hampshire primary but what will happen after the 2024 race for the Republican nomination is over. In the days since Iowa, Vice-Presidential speculation has kicked into high gear, the revenge campaign against Trump holdouts has begun, and the remaining debates before the vote in New Hampshire were cancelled after Trump and his remaining sort-of-serious opponent, the former South Carolina governor, Nikki Haley, refused to participate. It’s not a competition, it turns out, so much as a romp.

Still, the usual caveats about Iowa, some of which are very Trump-specific, apply. The former President’s big win—many news organizations called it an outright “triumph”; CNN hailed his “stunning show of strength”—came on the basis of a vanishingly small portion of the electorate, in a vanishingly small, wildly unrepresentative portion of the country. By the time all the breathless cable-news coverage was over and the media horde of a thousand journalists had moved on, Trump had received support from a mere fifty-six thousand caucus-goers, amounting to some seven per cent of the registered Republicans in the state and just three per cent of over-all registered voters in Iowa. More people voted for Muriel Bowser in Washington, D.C.,’s last mayoral primary. All told, Iowa represents less than one per cent of the nation’s population—and next week’s New Hampshire primary comes in a state that is even smaller.

As for Trump’s daunting margin of victory, it’s true he climbed above fifty per cent and left both Haley and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis some thirty points behind. It’s also true that a small but significant percentage of the Republican electorate—even in deep-red Iowa—will refuse to vote for the quadruply indicted former President who has led the G.O.P. through multiple national-election defeats in recent years. Never Trumpers are not a substantial force in this year’s G.O.P. primary; at the same time, Iowa proved that they still exist as a 2024 voting bloc and could—once again—help swing the general election to Joe Biden.

Excess hype aside, Iowa was a moment to be marked: the official 2024 launch of what looks to be Trump’s unstoppable march to the nomination. He is on track to become the first Republican to be the three-time nominee of his Party since Richard Nixon, and the first ever to win the nod three times consecutively. Not even Republican icons such as Teddy Roosevelt or Ronald Reagan managed the feat, though both Roosevelt and Reagan tried. Along the way to the history books, Trump has already rewritten the rules for modern political campaigns—refusing to debate, barely bothering to engage in retail politicking, and declining to offer a policy platform beyond a program of personal vengeance, a generalized commitment to the racial, religious, and class-based grievances of his followers, and a pledge to dismantle as much of the “deep state” federal government as possible. This is straight out of the aspiring dictator’s handbook for winning elections.

And, yet, Trump’s victory in Iowa was big enough, and predictable enough, that there was an almost awkward lack of new revelations. The polls foreshadowing his supersized win were more or less right; his opponents were as weak and divided and spineless as they had seemed in advance to be; the Associated Press and the networks did not even wait an hour into the caucusing before declaring Trump the winner. David Axelrod and George Will were in violent agreement about the “feral” nature of Trump’s repeat candidacy. Is there anything left to say about all this other than, Wow, are we in trouble?

The more unexpected political news this week might have been among the Democrats. Vice-President Kamala Harris, after three years of nearly unrelentingly bad P.R., did so well summing up the high stakes of the 2024 election in an interview on “The View” that even Trump’s former White House press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, was moved to praise the effectiveness and “style” of her message about the threats Trump poses to women’s reproductive freedom and to everyone’s democracy. McEnany did this on Fox News, in a fast-talking rant so unambiguously positive about Harris’s delivery that I had to watch it a couple of times to make sure I had heard correctly. At another point in the interview, Harris was asked how worried she was about the possibility of a Trump return to power. “Scared as heck,” she replied. Which, really, is the only possible answer.

Looking ahead to New Hampshire and whatever lies beyond, there remains a sort of comforting familiarity to the horse-race coverage. After all, the Republican nomination contest is not finally, officially, for real over; how can it be when New Hampshire hasn’t actually voted? Will Haley somehow pull out a victory or is it already preordained that “she’s gonna get smoked,” as Chris Christie predicted last week when he dropped out and then refused to endorse her? Is DeSantis toast? Will either of them make it out of January and on to South Carolina before bowing to the inevitable and dropping out? These are easier questions to contemplate than the one that 2024 is actually punching us in the face with: Will Trump, after everything, be returned to the White House?

A punch in the face it is. Trump has never been one for subtlety. Hence, perhaps, the most notable statement to emerge in this Iowa caucus week. Not Trump’s pretend-nice victory speech on Monday night, or even his oh-so-predictable sneer at Haley’s given first name, Nimarata—which the former President misspelled, naturally. But his 1:57 a.m. screed on Thursday announced in the clearest terms possible for a man who is ranting in all caps on social media in the middle of the night what kind of President he aims to be—a leader unfettered by law, free to “CROSS THE LINE” and even to act as a “ROGUE COP” if that is what he wants to do. “ALL PRESIDENTS MUST HAVE COMPLETE & TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY, OR THE AUTHORITY & DECISIVENESS OF A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE STRIPPED & GONE FOREVER,” he declared. Turns out that his lawyer’s response last week in a federal appeals court was not just an overly zealous answer to an insane hypothetical about how far Trump’s assertion of Presidential immunity should reach: Trump really does seem to believe that the President of the United States is entitled to order Navy seal Team 6 to assassinate his political rivals.

Take comfort, if you will, that the Supreme Court, with its three Trump-appointed Justices, will no doubt soon have its say on this question and that few are expecting it to agree with Trump’s demand for “FULL IMMUNITY” from prosecution for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, or anything else. In the meantime, let the hundred and fifty words of Trump’s posting be a warning, as powerful an antidote imaginable for the feeling that, perhaps, everything is going to be O.K. ♦︎

Susan B. Glasser, a staff writer, is the co-author of “The Divider: Trump in the White House, 2017-2021.” Her column on life in Washington appears weekly on newyorker.com.

 

01/20/24 11:51 AM #16795    

 

Jay Shackford

Joan -- Good post on Trump believing that all Presidents should be granted absolute immunity for "crossing the line."  Hell, Thrump doesn't just cross the line -- he blows it up.  Bests everyone. 


01/20/24 04:43 PM #16796    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Jay, that was a very good article by Susan Glasser. Thanks. I heard on one of the shows that no other President has ever thought a President should have complete immunity but Nixon once said. If the President does its not illegal." regarding Watergate. Having said that Nixon didn't come close to Trump who describes a dictatorship that includes unchecked violence and retribution if he got in. He must never be President again. Love, Joanie

01/21/24 06:03 AM #16797    

 

Jack Mallory

 

". . . he claimed that Ms. Haley was in charge of security that day, and that she and others had turned down his offer to send troops to the Capitol.

“'Nikki Haley was in charge of security,' he said. (She was not.) 'We offered her 10,000 people, soldiers, National Guards, whatever they want. They turned it down. They don’t want to talk about that.'"

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/01/20/us/election-news-new-hampshire-trump?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=a-cb

Covfefe. 


01/21/24 10:42 AM #16798    

 

Joanie Bender (Grosfeld)

Jack, for sure Trump is cognitively in decline. He is really losing it with mixing up Pelosi for Haley and talking about WWII as if it never happened and acting like he is running against Barach Obama...He is definitely not mentally fit and not fit anyway as he would hire dictator assistants like Elise Stefanic, and Marjorie Taylor Green or Tucker Carlson for VP or other big positions.. He would get only total loyalists; those that would be dictator lapdogs. Well, we all know that but the challenge is getting more of the public to be aware of the danger of Trump. Love, Joanie


01/22/24 12:31 PM #16799    

 

Jay Shackford

Jay -- Cleaning out my files, I found this post from more than two years ago that I believe is worth recirculating.  It's amazing how little things have changed  regarding our bat-shit crazy, twice impeached, four-times indicted ex-President who still faces 91 felony counts and who gets Nikki Haley mixed up with Nancy Pelosi and believes he ran against Barack Obama in the 2016 election.  Even so, he's the favorite in tomorrow's New Hampshire primary.  With that said, I'm not giving up that Nikki might pull off the upset of the century. Bests, everyone.  

October 30, 2021

(Editor’s note: Below is a passage from Lawrence Wright’s “The Plague Year,” which was published earlier this year.  In chapter 20, titled The Hedgehog and the Fox, he makes an insightful comparison between the personalities of Anthony Fauci and President Trump – one that really sums up Trump’s inability to fight the pandemic.  Wright is best known for his book about Osama bin Laden titled  “The Looming Tower.”  Besides being a gifted writer, he’s a kind of historian/journalist who sees trends in world events and undercurrents of history long before his fellow journalists.)  Enjoy….

The Play-doh Truth

There was an erudite parlor game that Oxford undergraduates used to play in the 1930s. It derived from a fragment of Greek poetry which said, “The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.” Depending on their understanding of this Delphic verse, the undergraduates would divide personalities into hedgehogs or foxes. Hedgehogs are dogged and concentrated; they live their lives believing that the world is organized by universal laws, even if those laws are not entirely graspable. Foxes are scattered and contradictory, taking what they need for their journey without a real destination in mind. The game is a bit like casting a horoscope with only two astrological signs.

Isaiah Berlin took the hedgehog/fox dichotomy as a starting point for his famous lecture on Tolstoy. He later admitted he never meant it seriously. He insisted that he didn’t intend the fox to be superior to the hedgehog, or vice versa, and he acknowledged that a single person could encompass both qualities. Tolstoy, for instance, confounded the distinction.

Anthony Fauci and Donald Trump, however, thoroughly embodied these opposing archetypes. They were in some glancing ways very much alike: New Yorkers, both in their seventies, immensely confident, optimistic, neither requiring more than five hours of sleep at night. In other respects, they were almost comically opposite. “We had this interesting relationship,” Fauci later recalled, “a New York City camaraderie thing.” That wouldn’t last. 

Fauci is small, trim, dapper, an “unflappable bullet of a man,” as Natalie Angier once memorably described him. He has the hedgehog’s intensity, working sixteen to seventeen hours a day, taking only Sundays off to be with his family. He used to run seven miles at lunchtime, no matter what the weather, but he switched to power-walking with his wife at night. He has led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) through six administrations, rejecting promotions or the prosperous lure of private industry. His idea of fun is “being with my wife and children and eating fried calamari, drinking a glass of wine.”

Trump has led a life marked by chaos and full of great wealth, spectacular bankruptcies, three marriages, two divorces, Playboy models and porn stars, cheated workers, showy skyscrapers, failed casinos, television stardom, tabloid fame—a life spent surfing the wave of popular culture without ever probing deeply into any defining pursuit. Even his run for the presidency was whimsical, as much for brand promotion as it was for revenge against what he perceived as Barack Obama’s slights. 

Whimsy and grievance—what he termed his gut feelings—drove him and the nation that he dragged behind him, but it was never clear where he was taking us, nor perhaps did he know or especially care.

The relationship between Trump and Fauci was wary. They were handcuffed to each other, Fauci needing the president to allow him to do his job, Trump needing to keep the one person America trusted most in his camp. From Trump’s perspective, Fauci was dangerous because he didn’t have enough to lose and could not be relied upon to bend to the president’s will, as had nearly everyone who remained in his administration. Unlike the CDC, HHS, and the FDA, Fauci’s institution had not been bullied into submission by political appointees. Fauci and his colleagues at NIAID were outliers in the Trump-era medical research establishment, but they were also the best hope for a workable, effective, and politically timely vaccine.

To trim Fauci’s vast constituency, the president pushed him off the Sunday morning news shows and onto talk radio and webinars. But Fauci’s influence remained unsquashable, an ever- present reminder of the peril the country was in, honestly admitting the blunders committed by the most powerful nation in the world, the one ostensibly best prepared to face such a catastrophe, but now pitied, feckless, and beaten.

Trump belittled Fauci while also envying his appeal. He retweeted that there was a conspiracy “by Fauci & the Democrats to perpetuate Covid deaths to hurt Trump.” The president told Sean Hannity that Fauci was “a nice man, but he’s made a lot of mistakes.” He accused Fauci of misleading the country about hydroxychloroquine, which Trump continued to cling to as a miracle cure even after the FDA withdrew its emergency authorization. “He’s got this high approval rating, so why don’t I have a high approval rating, and the administration, with respect to the virus?” Trump wondered aloud at a press briefing. “It can only be my personality.” A recent poll had showed that for information about the coronavirus, 67 percent of voters trusted Fauci, compared with 26 percent for Trump.

Fauci, a devout fan of the Washington Nationals, was invited to throw out the first pitch for the World Series champions, who were playing in an empty stadium like all teams in this spectatorless year. As Fauci was preparing to walk to the mound, wearing a Nats mask, Trump told the press that he had been invited to throw out a first pitch as well. “I think I’m doing that on August 15 at Yankee Stadium.” No one had told the Yankees. Later Trump tweeted that his own busy schedule made it impossible to accommodate the August date. “We will make it later in the season!”

Covid-19 told us more about these two men than any other individuals in the country. For Fauci, science was a self-correcting compass, always pointed at the truth. For Trump, the truth was Play-doh, and he could twist it to fit the shape of his desire. 

 


01/23/24 08:07 PM #16800    

 

Joan Ruggles (Young)

Just watching the New Hampshire returns and wondering if Jack went to the polls today. I heard from an exit poll that a fair number of Dems were doing so. Were you??


01/23/24 08:25 PM #16801    

 

Jack Mallory

Haven't issued an eagle update for a long time. None seen at the nest yet this year, although this time last year they were busily rebuilding. 
 

BUT, today while washing lunch dishes I was looking out the window down toward the river and saw something big landing on the water. Grabbed the camera, got this view and picture, through the (dirty) window and screen. A terrible photo, but another reminder of what a great place this is to live. Ran out into the deck to try and get a better angle on the eagle, but away it went.  No idea if this is one of "mine" from the nest. 
 


 

 

And in case anybody wanted to see a genuine NH Democratic primary ballot . . . 

 

I forfeited my opportunity to vote for Paperboy Love Prince or Vermin Supreme, wrote in Joe. Right now, as first tallies are in, AP is calling the Trumpublican primary for Trump, but Haley's only 6 points or so behind-- much better than predicted?
 


01/24/24 02:27 PM #16802    

 

Helen Lambie (Goldstein)

Jack, you failed to mention your bald eagle was standing on a recently landed UFO!!


01/24/24 04:29 PM #16803    

 

Jack Mallory

No, Helen, an enormous snow-covered fried egg!

**********

Anybody else want to go in on a sweatshirt order? NONE!

https://www.npr.org/2024/01/24/1226371734/religious-nones-are-now-the-largest-single-group-in-the-u-s


01/25/24 01:46 PM #16804    

 

Jack Mallory

Made a quick, cameraless pass by the nest this morning, on the off-chance yesterday's eagle in the Contoocook might be there. Well, can't swear it's the same one but AN eagle was there as the iPhone pic shows.


 

Went home for the big gun, eagle hung around for my return. Now need to see the mate to be sure all is well. 
 


 


01/29/24 05:54 PM #16805    

 

Jay Shackford

January 28, 2024

 

“The Nikki Itch”

By Dead-Center Shacks

 

Whatever Donald Trump does — scratch, pick, yell, insult or threaten — It won’t go away.  It’s called the “Nikki Haley Itch” that Trump has been scratching and picking at ever since the Iowa Caucuses. It’s now a raw wound oozing with puss and needing medical attention.  

 

With each passing day, the “itch” is gaining strength, momentum and spreading to independents, old guard Republicans and other voters who haven’t yet lost their minds, driving “Old Bone Spurs” nuts.  “Who in the hell does ‘Nikki the bitch’ think she is”? Trump asks his closest advisors. “All the others — Tim Scott, the young guy from India whatever his name is — are falling in line and endorsing me.  But if you listen to Nikki you would think she won Iowa as well as New Hampshire.”  

 

Then Trump turned his ire to Senate Republicans who were supporting what many describe as the best and toughest border bill in decades being negotiated by a bipartisan group of Senators led by Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), who is considered by many as the most conservative Republican in Congress. It also has the strong support of Senators Tom Tillis and Lindsey Graham — both strong Trump supporters.  

 

Just listen to Trump's latest rants on Truth Social and elsewhere.  It has all the makings of a madman driven by fear and greed -- fear of going to jail, fear losing his fortune and fear of being branded as the biggest loser of the century.  

 

“A Border Bill is not necessary to stop the millions of people, many from jails and mental institutions located all over the World, that are POURING INTO OUR COUNTRY. It is an INVASION the likes of which no Country has ever had to endure. It is not sustainable or affordable, and will, under Crooked Joe Biden, ONLY GET WORSE,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

 

He then suggested that Democrats are using the border deal as a way to blame Republicans for the border crisis.

 

“I had the safest and most secure Border in U.S. History,” Trump continued. “I didn’t need a ‘Bill!’ They are using this horrific Senate Bill as a way of being able to put the BORDER DISASTER onto the shoulders of the Republicans. The Democrats BROKE THE BORDER, they should fix it. NO LEGISLATION IS NEEDED, IT’S ALREADY THERE!!!”

 

Trump told his supporters in a rally over the weekend that he was fine with Republicans blaming him if the bipartisan border deal tanks. Earlier that day, he slammed the border deal as a “catastrophe waiting to happen” in a series of Truth Social posts.

 

Some Republican senators have criticized Trump’s comments on the deal, including Sen. Tom Tillis (R-N.C.), who said it was “immoral” for Republicans to sink the deal to help the former president in his election bid.  Sen. Mitt Romney earlier called the President’s strategy on the border bill “appalling.”  Graham said that even if Trump were elected, he couldn’t get a better or tougher bill for the border because it requires a vote of 60 Senators to pass.  

 

But let’s face it — Trump is running out of issues to talk about.  The economy is improving and consumers and voters are gaining confidence.  Gas prices are below $3 per gallon.  Inflation has cooled down considerably.  President Biden has handled the all important foreign issues — the war in Ukraine, support for Israel and the war in Gaza — about as well as anyone could expect.  

 

The border was the one live issue Trump could grab and run with.  After all, he’s the one who first thought about building the “wall” and having Mexico pay for it.  (How did that work out?) In his crazy mind, Trump is the only one who can fix the border.  But, oh no, now his buddies in the Senate are turning on him — just like ‘Nikki the bitch’ did after Iowa and New Hampshire. 

 

 


01/31/24 12:14 PM #16806    

 

Jay Shackford

(Editors Note:  More and more of my friends and family have been getting Covid in recent months even though they've received their most recent vaccines.   Perhaps it has something to do with the rate at which all Americans are getting their Covid booster shots -- which is way down from late 2020 and early 2021 when we were desperately awaiting the release of the first vaccines for our particular age groups.  Well, I guess that's to be expected in a country where many school districts don't even require their students to have vaccines for measles and other deadly childhood diseases before enrolling in school.) 

 

 

WELLBEING

DECEMBER 20, 2023

New COVID Shot Uptake Lagging Behind Annual Flu Shot Rates

 

BY JEFFREY M. JONES

 

 

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • 29% have gotten new COVID-19 shot; 47% have gotten flu shot
  • Prior COVID-19 infection, safety concerns top reasons for not getting new shot
  • Near record-low 23% of Americans are worried about getting COVID-19

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Less than one-third of Americans, 29%, have gotten the new COVID-19 vaccine that was released this fall. In contrast, 47% of U.S. adults say they have gotten the annual flu shot this year.

Another 20% of U.S. adults indicate they plan to get the new COVID-19 shot, which could bring the level of current vaccination against COVID-19 to close to half of Americans, but that still falls below the combined 63% who have gotten or plan to get the flu shot.

These results are based on Gallup’s latest COVID-19 survey update, conducted Nov. 30-Dec. 7 with more than 6,000 adult members of Gallup’s probability-based panel.

Gallup had found that over seven in 10 U.S. adults had received the earlier versions of COVID-19 vaccines, which were first available to the public in late 2020 and early 2021. The past two years, booster shots to those initial vaccines were made available. The new shot can be given to people regardless of whether they have been previously vaccinated against COVID-19.

Older Americans, those aged 65 and older, are getting the updated COVID-19 shots at higher rates than the general population -- 46% have already done so. However, seniors are still more likely to have gotten the annual flu shot, with 68% saying they had.

This year, public health officials have also recommended that older Americans get vaccinated against respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV. To date, 22% of U.S. seniors have gotten an RSV vaccination.

In addition to age differences, vaccine intentions for both COVID-19 and flu differ by party identification, but more so for COVID-19.

  • Whereas nearly half of Democrats (48%) have gotten the updated COVID-19 shot, 20% of political independents and 10% of Republicans have.
  • Eighty-two percent of Republicans say they will not get the updated COVID-19 shot.
  • Sixty-one percent of Democrats, 38% of independents and 35% of Republicans have gotten the flu shot this year. Half of Republicans, 52%, say they will not do so.

Prior COVID-19 Infections, Safety Concerns Underlie Vaccine Hesitancy

Among the subset of U.S. adults who do not intend to receive the new COVID-19 shot, their primary reasons for not doing so are because they have had COVID-19 and believe they have antibodies (27%) and because of safety concerns about the vaccine (24%). The next most common reasons are because of questions about the effectiveness of the vaccine (18%) and because they don’t believe they would suffer serious health effects from the coronavirus (16%).

Smaller proportions under 10% say they distrust vaccines in general or are concerned about an allergic reaction to the vaccine.

Forty-two percent of Democratic holdouts say they do not intend to get the new COVID-19 shot because they have had COVID-19, a much larger percentage than for independents (26%) or Republicans (20%) who don’t plan to be vaccinated. Republicans who do not plan to get the COVID-19 vaccine are most likely to cite safety concerns (31%) as their primary reason.

Worry About COVID-19 Subdued; Public Sees Improving Situation

Americans may see less of a need to get vaccinated against COVID-19 because they are less worried about getting the illness and believe the situation is improving.

Twenty-three percent of U.S. adults are very or somewhat worried about getting COVID-19, which is near the low in Gallup’s trend. Concern had ticked up in the prior survey, conducted in August and September, from 18% to 27% before edging down this month.

The high point in worry was measured in separate July and August 2020 surveys, when the pandemic was still in its earlier stages and before a vaccine had been developed. The low point was 17% in June 2021, when cases were declining and the vaccine was widely available.

After a less optimistic assessment of the COVID-19 situation in the August/September survey, a majority of Americans, 53%, once again see the situation as getting better. Thirty-two percent say the situation is not changing, and 15% believe it is getting worse.

Still, Americans are not as positive as they were earlier this year, when 71% thought the situation was improving.

An analysis of the data shows that Americans who are more concerned about getting COVID-19, personally, or believe the situation is worsening in the country, are more likely to have gotten vaccinated or to plan to get vaccinated.

Forty-two percent of those who are worried about getting COVID-19 have gotten the new shot, compared with 34% who are not too worried and 15% who are not worried at all. All told, 73% of those who are worried have gotten vaccinated or plan to, compared with one in four among those who are not worried at all about getting the coronavirus.

Similarly, 42% who think the COVID-19 situation is getting worse have already gotten the updated shot, compared with roughly a quarter of those who think the situation is improving or not changing.

Bottom Line

Americans seem to be heeding public health officials’ recommendation to get annual flu shots to a greater degree than they are complying with their advice to get the latest COVID-19 vaccine. This may reflect lessened worry about the COVID-19 situation as it pertains to them personally and to the country more broadly. Gallup did not ask respondents about their concern with getting the flu or their assessment of the flu situation in the U.S., so it is not possible to know if greater levels of flu vaccination stem from greater worry about the flu situation than the COVID-19 situation. Greater rates of flu vaccination may reflect that that procedure is more of an established routine for Americans than getting annual COVID-19 shots.

To stay up to date with the latest Gallup News insights and updates, follow us on X.

 

01/31/24 03:17 PM #16807    

 

Jack Mallory

The documentary archivist found NBC film footage. April 1, 1971. Full head of dark brown hair. Who IS this guy?
 


01/31/24 05:34 PM #16808    

 

Glen Hirose

    You smoked Winston?

          HOLY SMOKES! Vintage Cigarette Ads – Eightvape

   


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

agape